Talk:Magic Wormhole
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by Toffee Dude in topic Merge proposal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magic Wormhole article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | The content of Rymdport was merged into Magic Wormhole on 3 June 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. Needs more sources. Happy editing!
North8000 (talk) 20:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merged.
Toffee Dude-talk!01:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
- The result of this discussion was merged.
I propose merging Rymdport into Wormhole (protocol)#Implementations. Rymdport is just a GUI implementation of Wormhole (suitable for the Implementations section), and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Wormhole.Toffee Dude (talk) 09:18, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support as a preferred WP:ATD for Rymdport. ~Kvng (talk) 22:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support for the reasons given in the proposal. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 11:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.