Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a222665c7d1bb87b

Jump to content

Talk:Magic Quadrant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by BurcuAtGartner in topic Request for editors to update article introduction

Request for editors to update article introduction

[edit]

My name is Burcu and I work for Gartner. I've been posting requests over at the Gartner article Talk page. I have one brief request for this article: I'm hoping we can lightly revise the article introduction in order to update the sourcing and factual claims. A lot of the material throughout the article appears to have been written in 2009, so I hope you'll agree that a refresh is overdue.

Right now the introduction reads as follows:

My suggestion is to change it to the following:

A quick review of changes: I changed "IT consulting firm" to "research and advisory firm" as that's how Gartner is commonly referred to on first reference in media coverage. You can see examples of that here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. I changed the sourcing for the first sentence from a 2008 Gartner website post to an academic paper from the same period. And I added a third sentence noting that the MQ occasionally becomes inapplicable to certain markets as they reach maturity (or other factors render the framework inapplicable).

I have a conflict of interest so I won't be making this change myself. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. BurcuAtGartner (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2025 (UTC) BurcuAtGartner (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done First two minor changes seem fine. New sentence is fine as well but I'm not sure it belongs in the lead, which should generally summarize the body of the article (WP:LEAD) and is also kind of specific for the first paragraph. I have put it at the end of the "Rating" section for now, though this is not really great given how it's structured, feel free to suggest alternatives. Rusalkii (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your help, Rusalkii. I might look closer later, but I think this is good for now. The details about ending particular Magic Quadrant listings make sense where you put them. BurcuAtGartner (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. "Magic Quadrants and MarketScopes: How Gartner Evaluates Vendors Within a Market". Gartner.com. February 2008. Archived from the original on March 12, 2006. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
  2. Gartner (2019), Gartner Magic Quadrant: Frequently Asked Questions, accessed 6 June 2020
  3. Bresciani, Sabrina; Eppler, Martin J. (2008). "Gartner's magic quadrant and hype cycle" (PDF). Institute of Marketing and Communication Management (IMCA) (19): 3–18. Retrieved January 23, 2025.
  4. Gartner (2019), Gartner Magic Quadrant: Frequently Asked Questions, accessed 6 June 2020
  5. Gonzalez, Kenneth (September 4, 2023). "The Magic Quadrant is dead. But ITSM isn't". Freshworks.
  6. Nicastro, Dom (January 28, 2023). "Why Did Gartner Kill the Web Content Management Magic Quadrant?". CMSWire.
  7. Canner, Ben (March 31, 2020). "Why Did Gartner Retire the IGA Magic Quadrant?". Solutions Review.