Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26ab1eada7c224d

Jump to content

Talk:Magda Staudinger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kayeligold in topic Recommendation

Recommendation

[edit]

I think adding more sections to the article to help guide the reader would make this article better. Adding more sections would require more information, and I think it would be helpful to find and use more secondary sources to pull information from in order to add more to each section, which will make this article more informative. There are a lot of links to information, and I think it would be beneficial to implement some of the information from those articles into this one to give the readers a quick way to learn about it. Joe Cesare (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Joe Cesare WP is an interactive and collaborative project. I see from your page that you are new, but typically, if you want to make a change, just do it. You don't need "permission" and you only need to discuss with other editors who have worked on the article if you are making contentious changes. The only things you need to be cautious about are never copy/paste someone else's work, do not add material without sourcing, and do not break reference citations if you move text. SusunW (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Recommendation

[edit]

I second Joe Cesare's recommendation, and would further suggest that the additional sections included in the article should focus more on Magda Staudinger's accomplishments, rather than her connection to her husband. Based on the article and the links sourced at the bottom, Staudinger was clearly a decorated scientist, and I think it would beneficial to provide information about her own findings. Expanding on Staudinger's pioneering research and significant contributions to her field would not only make the article more comprehensive but also rightfully highlight the work of an important female scientist whose accomplishments have often been overshadowed. By showcasing her independent scientific legacy, separate from her husband's, the article can provide a more balanced and informative perspective while promoting recognition of women in science. Kayeligold (talk) 20:51, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply