Talk:Madhabi
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by AryKun in topic GA Review
 | Madhabi was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 23, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Madhabi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 04:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Serious issues with this article, the main one being sourcing, with the entire Theme section and isolated sentences elsewhere being uncited. I'll get on to the rest of the review once this is addressed. AryKun (talk) 04:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping Wallflowernepal
- Nearly a week since the start of the review and issues have still not been addressed, so I will fail this. AryKun (talk) 12:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)