Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24093c41bbfc465

Jump to content

Talk:Macrurosaurus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Zigongosaurus1138 in topic Authorship date

Authorship date

[edit]

What should the authorship date be? The text of this article states that the taxon was only considered valid upon the 1876 paper. However, the listed authorship date in the taxobox was recently changed to 1869, on the basis that the taxon was actually described in that paper after all. But if that is so, why is it written in the text that it was only valid from 1876? Is it possible that the initial 1869 description was insufficient to be a valid description?

Few papers seem to refer to this taxon, but these two refer to the authorship as "Seeley, 1869":

  • Le Loeuff, J., Suteethorn, S. and Buffetaut, E., 2013. A new sauropod dinosaur from the Albian of Le Havre (Normandy, France). Oryctos, 10, pp.23-30.
  • Knoll, F., COLLETÉ, C., DUBUS, B. and PETIT, J.L., 2000. On the presence of a sauropod dinosaur (Saurischia) in the Albian of Aube (France). Geodiversitas, 22(3), pp.389-394.

Although, interestingly, this one seems to refer to the authorship as "Seeley, 1869, 1876"?:

  • Calvo, J.O. and Bonaparte, J.F., 1991. Andesaurus delgadoi gen. et sp. nov.(Saurischia-Sauropoda), titanosaurid dinosaur from the Río Limay Formation (Albian-Cenomanian), Neuquén, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 28, pp.303-310.

Note that this also has relevance to the list of years in paleontology pages. Currently this taxon's description is listed in the 1876 in paleontology page. With no reference, of course. Those articles are a mess.

Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply