Talk:Machining vibrations
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Solving?
[edit]Reading this does not really give any advice on how to solve the problem. The only hint is the "hydraulic expansion tool holder". not only does it say nothing about this, there is no mention of it anywhere else on wikipedia. 188.28.250.157 (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Some simple advice like: "slowing or increasing cutting speed by a small amount can often reduce chatter caused by a resonance of the cutting speed with vibration of the tool or work" might help. Other approaches are to reduce depth of cut, slow or increase feed-rate, use different tool angles, ensure all tools are sharp... perhaps most important for manual maching is to approach the work with confidence, gingerly poking it with the tool invites chatter.
Neologisms?
[edit]Robustify? Rigidify? Good grief! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.251.81 (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Poor wording
[edit]This article uses poor terminology. Specifically, not all vibration is chatter, and contrary to what this article currently implies, vibration is going to happen inherently. The trick is in minimizing the negative impact of such vibrations to create an even surface.
While there's a fair bit of good technical information here, the use of "vibration" to mean "chatter" is fundamentally inaccurate, and misleading to the reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.140.226 (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
F-16 example
[edit]This F-16 example seems quite inappropriate and has no source. Wth? ~2026-15084-73 (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- not only is the claim unsubstantiated, it is verifiably false and has been dismissed. I removed it from the article. Perhaps a better legitimate example could be included and cited in its place Conover10 (talk) 06:03, 26 May 2026 (UTC)