Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28b7c50ddacaddf

Jump to content

Talk:Maastrichtian dialect

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by N1CK3Y in topic Expert help

(Historical) Vocabulary influences from other languages

[edit]

This paragraph is partly incorrect. Gans en dien are not loanwords, they are original Germanic words. Gans also used to be a standard word in Dutch (nowadays archaic) an dien is related to Middle Dutch "dijn" (your). --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Expert help

[edit]

I included a template relating to the IPA section to have an expert help. This specifically deals with clear-cut examples to compare Maastrichtian pronunciation with words in English etc. LightPhoenix (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The soft G is incorrect. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 04:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

From what I learned from my Dutch teacher about the dialect, the French in the vocabulary, contrary to popular opinion, doesn't come from being near to Francophone territory or conservatism, but from the quite an high percentage of higher level secondary schools (HBS, Atheneum, Gynasium) in Limburg being French till well into the twentieth century (till WW-II). As a result of this a lot of the cultural elite was generally fluent in French. 88.159.74.100 (talk) 21:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think the assumption that noondedzju is of French origin is probably incorrect. Noondedzju is obviously very close to the Walloon "nondidjû" and considering it a remnant of the Prince-Bishopric of Liège times makes sense. N1CK3Y (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply