Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d74d929676c75

Jump to content

Talk:MRK1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Kaini in topic prod

prod

[edit]

keep: the artist in question has releases on Rephlex Records and Planet Mu, both record labels that easily pass WP:N. in addition he's referenced in the main dubstep article

Kode9 commented on a DJ MRK1 (formerly Mark One) track, observing that listeners "have internalized the double-time rhythm" and the "track is so empty it makes [the listener] nervous, and you almost fill in the double time yourself, physically, to compensate" - Invisible Jukebox, The Wire no. 269, July 2006

--Kaini (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll replace it with notability tag seeing as it's borderline. What it needs, per the guidline linked from the tag, is a few more reliable sources preferably solely about the guy, things like having won awards would do it automatically. Note also you can remove db tags yrself so long as you didn't create the article yourself. Thanx--Bsnowball (talk) 11:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
well, for the time being here's some (physical) releases listed on Forced Exposure, here's his page on Planet Mu records, and here's his listing on Boomkat. that would pass muster in any AfD i've been involved in. --Kaini (talk) 01:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Wait, does that mean I have to put the tag back on even though it is not needed? Let me know as soon as possible. DubCrazy (talk) 02:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)DubCrazyReply
no, you're fine to remove it as long as you're not the creator of the article --Kaini (talk) 08:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply