Talk:MONA number
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by SchreiberBike in topic AfC comments
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
When this goes live ...
[edit]When this goes live:
- the redirects Hodges number and MONA number, should be changed to go to this article
- the disambiguation page Mona, should have a link to this article
- the template Template:Taxonbar databases, should have it's MONA link change to this article
and their are undoubtedly others. I would be happy to work on that.
Thanks, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 21:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Edits for clarity. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
AfC comments
[edit]Should this be merged with List of moths of North America instead of having a separate article? — The Earwig talk 06:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)}}
- As someone who works on Wikipedia primarily on moths, I think it stands on its own. MONA number or Hodges number are widely used. Rather, some of the material at List of moths of North America should be removed and this article linked on that page. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 06:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)