Talk:MK

Comments

It's in the name Mary- Kate — Preceding unsigned comment added by MightyDinoPower15 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@MightyDinoPower15: Where's your reliable source that she goes by those initials? Sundayclose (talk) 03:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

It's what fans of the twins go by — Preceding unsigned comment added by MightyDinoPower15 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@MightyDinoPower15: Where is your source? Your personal opinion is not a reliable source. Sundayclose (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit request

Please add a wiktionary link

{{wiktionary|MK|Mk|mK|mk}}

-- 67.70.27.105 (talk) 02:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done Terasail^[✉] 21:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

MK High Tops Tennis Shoes.

Did You Only Made One Pair Of High Top Tennis Shoes With Gold Trim With You Initials In Gold? Because I See Where I Live, I'm The Only One. 2600:1010:B01E:A96A:B447:2B6A:85D:3E27 (talk) 09:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

MK Mary Kate TDI REBOOT

On the fictional characters media there should be added "MK" Mary-Kate – TDI REBOOT Kilian721 (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. No idea what this proposed disambiguation page entry is supposed to refer to: a search shows there is no Wikipedia article titled "TDI Reboot". Day Creature (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

In particular, there is no article about "MK" Mary-Kate – TDI REBOOT, so nowhere for a link to go. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

mk asteroid

wheres the mk asteroid? Erikgobrrrr (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

let me Google that for you:

• https://www.google.com/search?q=mk+asteroid

There you go.

Wikipedia has no article about 2025 MK. We do have 2024 MK, if you want a model. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

@JMF you're right it does thx Erikgobrrrr (talk) 02:32, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 6 November 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Speedy moved. Unanimous support and seemingly obvious merit. (closed by non-admin page mover) —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

---

Mk → MK – You cannot form a word with “Mk.” GilaMonster536 (talk) 13:35, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support: It seems like majority of the articles listed in this DAB go by the initialism MK. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 14:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
• Support per nom and 1isall. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

As no-one has come forward to defend the status quo and there is nothing in the article to suggest that it was ever valid, I will now be bold and just do it. There is no obvious reason to consider it a controversial move. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:37, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Drat, it is one of those that need admin support as it needs the other MK article to be deleted first. I will ask. I see it is already on the request list and I have just declared my support. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC) Updated --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

It didn't need an admin – just a page-mover. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Markup (business)

One of the topics listed is Markup (business), but the abbreviation "mk" or "MK" is not used in the linked article on this subject, thus failing WP:DABMENTION. Is the abbreviation actually commonly used? Should a mention of the abbreviation be added to the Markup (business) article? Should this topic be removed from the disambiguation page? A quick search outside of Wikipedia did not find any usage of "mk" for "markup". (I did find it mentioned on low-quality acronym definition pages as an abbreviation for "market", "mark" or "marking", but not "markup".) —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Given that your investigation has identified no supporting evidence, you should feel free to delete such obvious nonsense on sight. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2025 (UTC) Revised to add preface in green --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC)