Talk:M-PHY
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Sentence needs rework
[edit]Expanded for clarity:
Options to extend its range could include
- operation over a short flexible flat cable,
- and M-PHY was designed to support optical media converters allowing extended distance between transmitters and receivers,
- and reducing concerns with electromagnetic interference.
One of these things is anti-parallel.
Also, maybe just "reduce EMI"?
Finally, why "flexible"? Flexible invites kink, and kink is bad. — MaxEnt 21:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Strong source
[edit]Here is a strong source I don't have the gas to work into the article.[1]
References
- ↑ Loberg, Chris (2 September 2014). "D-PHY, M-PHY & C-PHY? First Look at Testing MIPI's Latest PHY". eetimes.com. EE Times. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
MIPI sees M-PHY as the high-performance PHY with speeds up to 5.8 Gbps while D-PHY is more for cameras and displays and lower-speed applications.
More about C-PHY:
In contrast, C-PHY uses a 3-pin architecture and an embedded clock. Each of the pin trios represents one lane with up to three lanes supported for a total of 9 pins. It also uses a new encoding scheme to increase the number of bits transmitted to approximately 2.28 bits per symbol. The projected data rate is 2.5 Gsymbols/s for an effective data rate of about 5.7 Gbits/s.
D-PHY replacement
[edit]>M-PHY was designed to supplant D-PHY in many applications, but this is expected to take a number of years.
Citation needed. Sealfoss (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)