Talk:Lyocell
Add topicLatest comment: 6 months ago by Butters-the-Biscuit in topic The use of "sic" in "In 2004 Lenzing was producing 40,000 tons [sic, probably metric tonnes]"
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lyocell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T.Wang_ex_Cheng.JPG){kind=small}
Manufacture section needs rewrighting
[edit]It is written as an essay and mostly coppied from here: --Langbein Rise (talk) 11:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The use of "sic" in "In 2004 Lenzing was producing 40,000 tons [sic, probably metric tonnes]"
[edit]I am confused about the "sic" in this sentence. Sic is generally used with direct quotes, but this sentence is not directly quoting anything, so what is it for? Is it trying to say while the source puts production capacity in tons (long or short tons), that figure should be in metric tons instead? If so, how do we know? Perhaps Template:Convert would be better here? Butters-the-Biscuit (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2026 (UTC)