Talk:Lymphatic malformations

Untitled

The assignment to generate references requires you to generate a list of the discussion page.... not in the actual article.--JimmyButler (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Potential references

1. "Cutaneous lymphangioma".
2. "Radiology".
3. "Therapy".
4. "Splenic Lymphangioma".
5. "Laryngoscope".
6. "Lymphangiomas".
7. 1987 Medical Encyclopedia
8. "Injection".
9. "Multicystic".
10. "Pathology".
11. "Childhood Cystic".
12. "New Treatment".
13. "Embryological".
14. "Endothelial Cells".
15. "Cystic Hygroma".
16. "Cystic Hygroma Treatment".
17. "Giant Cystic Hygroma".
18. "Cystic Retroperitoneal".
19. "Magnetic resonance".
20. "Sarcoma".
21. "Cervical".
22. "laparoscopic approach".
23. "Spleen Lymph".
24. "Magnetic".
25. "Circumscription".
26. "Adult Lymph".
27. "Recalcitrant Breast Lymph".
28. "Radio. Therapy".
29. "In Children".
30. "Warts?".
31. "Cystic intrapulmonary lymphangioma".
32. "Thoracic".
33. "Circumscription Lymph. Def".
34. "otolaryngologic".
35. "Orbital Lymph".
36. "Small-Bowel Mesentery" (PDF).
37. "Long Term Article".
38. "Lymph Definition".
39. "Basic Lymphangioma".
40. "Lyphangioma".

---

Graded --JimmyButler (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Literal Citations

You are on the right path, yet I would suggest removal of your current literal citations (quotes) and replacment with your own words. If you continue to do this, you will simply have to edit it down the road as you attempt GA status. Why would I want to read this article if I can just read the one you quoted all your info from...? This is why you must put it into your own words - sentence fluency is a must. Food_Puma 20:52, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

optimal section arrangement

Optimal section arrangement as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles):

• Classification
• Signs and symptoms or Characteristics
• Causes or Genetics
• Pathophysiology or Mechanism
• Diagnosis (including Characteristic biopsy findings and differential diagnosis)
• Prevention or Screening
• Treatment or Management
• Prognosis
• Epidemiology
• History (not patient history)
• Society and culture (e.g., stigma, economics, religious aspects, awareness, legal issues)
• Research directions
• In other animals
• See also (avoid if possible, use wikilinks in the main article)
• Notes
• References
• Further reading or Bibliography (paper resources such as books, not web sites)
• External links (avoid if possible)
• Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 09:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lymphangioma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120218194321/http://www.righthealth.com/Health/Lymphangioma/-od-definition_adam_1%252F0001481-s to http://www.righthealth.com/Health/Lymphangioma/-od-definition_adam_1%25252F0001481-s

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Undertook a full rewrite, outdated/incomplete/inconsistent information

I recently did a full rewrite of this article (‘complete rewrite’ in edit summary) to reflect updated research and understanding of this condition. This is my first time editing a Wikipedia article, so I welcome feedback/suggestions on how to improve. My aim was to correct outdated and inconsistent information, and add current references. I have lived experience with LM, and over the years have visited this page but it has often misled me/had outdated info (e.g. classed as 'oncology' when it isn't a cancer) so I was keen to refresh. Happy to discuss and adjust if anyone has concerns, I will be making further updates over time to improve as well. HannahS8775 (talk) 10:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)