Talk:Lunar orbit
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Arlo Barnes in topic another relevant StackExchange thread
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lunar orbit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
What Delta-V typically needed for lunar orbit insertion
[edit]'lunar orbit insertion' redirects here but there are no numbers. Lunar Orbit Insertion says only that "... free-return trajectory to the Moon ... is a rather high energy path, which necessitates a very large (~1,000 m/s or 3,000 fps) maneuver to achieve [elliptical] orbit insertion," followed by a circularisation burn. - Rod57 (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- On Stackexchange someone wrote "From an Earth-Moon Hohmann transfer, it takes about 680 m/s to reach a low lunar orbit at ~100 km altitude." "The Apollo missions started from a faster transfer orbit, so they required a little more ∆v; Apollo 11's initial LOI burn was 889 m/s to enter a 113 km pericynthion, 313.4 km apocynthion orbit." - Rod57 (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
another relevant StackExchange thread
[edit]selenostationary orbital distance for any tidally locked moon Arlo James Barnes 10:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class spaceflight articles
- Mid-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Moon articles
- Low-importance Moon articles
- Moon task force articles
- Start-Class Solar System articles
- Low-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force