Talk:Luggnagg
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by Shhhnotsoloud in topic Merge from Struldbrugg
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 25 September 2020. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Book stubs on the article page.
|
Merge from Struldbrugg
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of the discussion, and noting the similar proposal and AfD, was not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
While reviewing Talk:Gulliver's_Travels#Merger_proposal, I've noticed that User:PatGallacher proposed such a merger, which was seconded by User:Toughpigs. Nobody however started the proper discussion, so here it goes (and count me as the third support vote for this - however, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Struldbrugg, closed as keep not that long ago). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Well I'm opposed; What is the reason for this merger? I don’t see much overlap or duplication, and the article is bigger than stub size. Why do you want these articles merged? Also, if your AfD failed because the term has independent notability, then there is a clear reason not to merge. Moonraker12 (talk) 12:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.