Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a244e3fcd8bbecd4

Jump to content

Talk:Luca Comai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jack Frost in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jack Frost (talk) 07:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that plant biology professor Luca Comai independently developed glyphosate resistant plants while working at Calgene and published his research before Monsanto researchers were able to? Source: "As if to drive the point home, Luca Comai whistled another shot past Monsanto's bow just a few months later. In October of 1985, he and several colleagues at Calgene published a paper in Nature describing their own glyphosate-tolerant plants...Comai's paper was a professional embarrassment to Monsanto." (Lords Of The Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, And The Future Of Food)

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 18:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC).Reply

  • The article is new and it is nominated within one day of its creation. The length of the prose is more than enough. The content is neutral and well cited. No copyright violations nor plagiarism were found. The hook is within the specified length and is interesting. The hook is cited in the book. I verified it with Google Book. QPQ is done. Teetee taw (talk) 08:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply