Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26af6266e3b51a8

Jump to content

Talk:Love Uprising

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 142.227.240.121 in topic Daft Punk "High Life" Sample

Daft Punk "High Life" Sample

[edit]

Is it noteworthy to mention that Daft Punk sampled "Break Down for Love" for their song "High Life" in 1997? I'm just wondering because it was recently discovered here that certain parts of the first and second verse, as well as the chorus, were used in High Life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.227.240.121 (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't see where your "1997" date comes from, since "High Life" was released in Daft Punk's 2001 album Discovery. In any case, a reliable source establishing notability would be required for the sample information. YouTube is not considered a reliable source; even if it was, a video where someone edits a song to make it sound like another song would be an inadequate source of sample information. jhsounds (talk) 20:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The date was my mistake, as I mixed up the release dates of the Discovery and Homework albums.

In any case, there aren't any articles aobut this particular sample because It was first discovered on YouTube, and only on YouTube. I know it's not a reliable source, But those samples definitely aren't a coincidence, wether they chopped and re-arranged, or not.

I even have a sample of "High Life" in the same key and tempo as "Break Down for Love," but I'm assuming that wouldn't be a reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.227.240.121 (talk) 18:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply