Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25e0e9348d2f41a

Jump to content

Talk:Louis Till

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Anastrophe in topic MacLean Source

Biography assessment rating comment

[edit]

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 18:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Emmett Till cause of death

[edit]

This article says that Louis Till's son Emmett was tortured to death. The Emmett Till article, while mentioning that young Emmett was beaten by his murderers, suggests that he died from being shot in the head, not from the torture. One of the articles needs to be corrected; I am not sure which one since I can't presently run down the Whitfield page 117 source cited in the article. Pirate Dan (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removal of content

[edit]

Hello, a fellow IP is attempting to removed sourced information. I'm inviting that user to discuss what they're trying to do in the talk page. Please do not edit war. 2603:8080:F600:5AD6:C9B5:D110:6E0D:573 (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Discussion of content

[edit]

@2603:8080:f600:27a2:8903:3321:19bc:fa57: I made some changes to the content we were (slightly) disputing over, my reasoning is below.

The last sentence of the first paragraph: I don't think it's needed point blank, it looks like it'd fit better on the Emmett Till article itself, as it's about Emmett Till's murder, and subsequent (attempted) justification, not so much about his father. I'd love to be proven wrong about this though, as I think it's good information (/srs)

The sentence in the final paragraph: It seems redundant, and reads a little bit like a young student's book report, as it just serves to justify the earlier sentence, without really adding anything to the section. (/lh)

I look forward to how you and I improve this article further :D Isro! (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

COI edits

[edit]

The article is larded with references to "Colonel French MacLean", and books he wrote. Most (all?) of the edits were performed by the author, based on past and current edit history. Eighteen of the 31 references are repeats of his book. I have no ill-will towards the author, but it appears that the article (and many others) have been used to promote his book(s), which violates WP:COI. However, this article is the largest offense, and knowing little to nothing about the topic, I can't really devote the time to repairing this. In other words - if other editors better familiar can have a look, that would be greatly appreciated. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The one thing I can do is consolidate all the repeated refs into a single instance... cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Mixed results. Since each ref had a page/pages specified, I could only partially consolidate. Not sure if there's a way to use the base ref and separately include the page numbers. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 05:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

MacLean Source

[edit]

I previously removed material cited to MacLean in the Dirlewanger Brigade article. The same concerns appear to apply to this article:

His website promotes a number of conspiracy theories and historical falsehoods. It includes blog posts like "Is Dr. Anthony Fauci Really a Dr. Josef Mengele?" and "The Wisdom of Crowds" which promotes (via JAQing) the Hitler survival conspiracy theory. He also engages in Holocaust revisionism (writing about Heinrich Müller, he says Müller was also active in resolving the Jewish question) and the Clean Wehrmacht myth (writing about Martin Steglich, he says Martin had little interest in politics and was truly a gentleman of the old school).
User:CamAnders

This seems to be enough to make his books unreliable sources.

pinging @Anastrophe as they previously expressed interest about this source.CamAnders (talk) CamAnders (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

(response on the John C. Woods talk page). cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 00:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply