Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2419967cd89b7b5

Jump to content

Talk:Lotto Max

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2604:3D09:7B79:A400:ADCB:7DA:7467:3F70 in topic 70 million was one by one person need to update stats

Relaunch/replace

[edit]

An unregistered editor rewrote this article and other lottery article to state that Super 7 is being relaunched as Lotto Max. The ILC news release annoucing Lotto Max:

  • said "Lotto Max will launch..."
  • included references to the "newest introduction", and
  • made no reference whatsoever to Super 7.

Given that Max has a different ticket price, draw structure, prize structure and name from Super 7, there is no basis for describing it as a relaunch of Super 7. Ground Zero | t 02:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you; replace is more appropriate here. Mindmatrix 14:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Lotto max didn't replace Super 7, super 7 was "phased out" to make room for future lottery games, much like pay-day will be, I wouldn't call lotto max a Super 7 replacement (GCompsupport (talk) 02:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC))Reply

Odds

[edit]

When I created this article I didn't calculate the odds however I was wondering if somebody could do that b/c ??? aren't really the odds. Krj373 (talk) 22:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The odds currently given in the article are wrong. What they've done is calculate the probability of a given selection winning each prize, and then divide the denominator by three (since there are three selections in each $5 play). But that method fails to take into account that one $5 play might a given prize twice (or all three times). The standard way to do the calculation is to apply the formula 1-(1-p)^3 where p is the probability of a single selection winning. (This assumes that at least two selections in each play are picked randomly by the computer and are stochastically independent of each other and of the third selection.) The correct probabilities in decimal form are as follows:
MatchProbability on a single selectionProbability on a $5 play
7/7 0.000000010.00000003
6/7 + bonus number 0.000000080.00000024
6/7 0.000003340.00001002
5/7 0.000210490.00063133
4/7 0.004677500.01396697
3/7 + bonus number 0.004343390.01297367
3/7 0.041262230.11874924
any prize 0.050497050.14397006
no prize 0.949502950.85602994
and in fractional form the probabilities are:
Matchchance on a single selectionchance on a $5 play
7/7 1 in 85,900,584.1 in 28,633,686.
6/7 + bonus number 1 in 12,271,512.1 in 4,090,506.5
6/7 1 in 299,305.21 in 99,768.7
5/7 1 in 4,750.881 in 1,583.96
4/7 1 in 213.791 in 71.60
3/7 + bonus number 1 in 230.231 in 77.08
3/7 1 in 24.2351 in 8.421
any prize 1 in 19.8031 in 6.946
no prize 1 in 1.05321 in 1.1682
Mathew5000 (talk) 06:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

70 million was one by one person need to update stats

[edit]

Alberta Calgary man $70,000,000 in November 2022 2604:3D09:7B79:A400:ADCB:7DA:7467:3F70 (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply