Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d3bc47aee5751

Jump to content

Talk:Lorteburn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 20 January 2023

Reinstating and expanding this article

[edit]

I have reinstated this article since there seems to be good evidence of the Langbourne having existed (see sources cited in the article) and it appears on maps of Londinium. It is unclear why it was originally turned into a redirect. Agrestis (talk) 06:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 20 January 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 12:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


LangbourneLorteburn – The name Lorteburn is the one printed on maps and referenced in scientific literature. See the article references for numerous examples. Lorteburn has a toponym with an understood meaning that can be referenced and which makes sense in the context of this stream (see article). 'Langbourne' seems to have been first used by John Stow and may well have been invented by him as a back-formation from the name of the city ward. John Stow is known to have invented toponyms in this way (see Barton). Agrestis (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.