Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25c8d962c145751

Jump to content

Talk:Lorcainide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by 2601:184:4200:6AAB:FD9E:25A3:8C18:A94F in topic Synthesis discrepancy

Citation style

[edit]

The reference list in this article may prove a bit difficult to maintain in the long run, since it all has to be updated manually. I propose moving it to WP:List-defined references using standard footnotes. That will keep the bulky part of the citations out of the text, but permit automatic numbering. Does anyone object? WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'd support that proposal. The use of templates for citations simplifies the use of tools to spot errors and makes maintenance and updating easier and LDRs make the wikitext in a well-referenced article much more readable. --RexxS (talk) 22:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Negative Data, Publication Bias, and 100,000 Deaths Controversy

[edit]

Um... conspiracy isn't my thing, but is there any reason the very well published controversy involving publication bias, hidden data, and over 100,000 deaths related to Lorcainide is not mentioned in this article?[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]Joel S Bateman (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. "Bad pharma: Drug research riddled with half truths, omissions, lies". Salon.com. 27 January 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  2. "The effect of lorcainide on arrhythmias and survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an example of publication bias". ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. 1 July 1993. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  3. "The Stigma of Negative Results". Science for Fitness. 4 February 2013. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  4. "The true lorcainide story revealed". The BMJ. 2 January 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  5. "PUBLICATION BIAS: WHY THE DRUGS MIGHT NOT WORK". Endless Trax. 7 October 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  6. "100,000 Avoidable Deaths". Cavernoma Alliance UK. 29 August 2014. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  7. "Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients". Google Books. 1 January 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  8. "Big Pharma Plays Hide-the-Ball With Data". Newsweek. 13 November 2014. Retrieved 13 August 2015.

Synthesis discrepancy

[edit]

The final step of the synthesis depicts alkylation of the piperidine ring using isopropylamine, whereas the text says it uses isopropyl bromide. This is a discrepancy that should be addressed.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:184:4200:6AAB:FD9E:25A3:8C18:A94F (talk) 16:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply