Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
This article is within the scope of the Paralympics task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites
Material from London was split out into Economy of London on 6 November 2006 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article is quite detailed and long, and I think there are several sections where information can be spun out and information summarised more effectively. Sections that might benefit from being shorter include:
The "Early modern" and "Late modern and contemporary" subsections in "History": the earlier sections are a lot shorter and I think these sections should try to match the level of information in those sections.
"Architecture": mention of specific buildings and monuments can be removed so the section can focus on more generalised statements about the city's architecture.
"Demographics": I think lots of this information can be spun out into Demographics of London. "Country of birth", "Ethnic groups" and "Languages" can be merged and summarised more effectively. "Religion" should focus on the statistics and remove mention of specific landmarks (like churches or mosques).
"Leisure and entertainment" is quite large. I recommend that the information be merged with "LGBT scene" and information be spun out into Culture of London and LGBT culture in London.
Keep. I copyedited the article and took out some prose. I think more work could be done on that end but for now I think its good enough for GA status. Z1720 (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 11 days ago8 comments3 people in discussion
The sentence London is the capital ... of England by convention needs a source. The next inline source does not establish this, but it is a statement that needs to be sourced, as it has been reverted in the England article. It does seem to have been England's capital in the past, but is it now? Tony Holkham(Talk)00:11, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am surprised that it needs a source as surely it is obvious. But Encyclopaedia Britannica will do:
'England is a highly urbanized country with several major cities. London stands out as the capital, the nation’s financial center, and a cultural hub.'
I'm also surprised at the ongoing doubt about this. When did it ever stop being the capital of England? And why do we need a source to state what is obvious? Roger 8 Roger (talk) 09:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
And I'm surprised you should ask the questions. I don't personally have any doubts about what is the capital of where, but this is Wikipedia, and if we say something is too obvious to need a source, where does that end up? ;o) Tony Holkham(Talk)09:29, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I imagine it can only come from doubts about England's status. Some might argue that the capital of the Kingdom of England was London, but since England no longer has its own government, how can it have a capital. Others are obsessed by legislation; if it isn't written down in law then it isn't true.
A capital does not need legislation or be the site of govt to be a capital. Why was there never any doubt about Edinburgh being the capital of Scotland? The Dutch have made it clear in writing that Amsterdam is the capital, presumably to stop similar ongoing doubt, although in the Dutch case The Hague would have a slightly stronger case than any place in England would have outside London. I agree, the doubt probably comes from (over thought) reasoning about England's status, but see my mention Scotland's status. I do think a source is only needed if there is any possible doubt about the city's status as capital (eg Amsterdam-The Hague). Even if England is not a country, its area is within the UK, whose capital is London, so we end up back where we started. (BTW, I know you know London is England's capital!) Roger 8 Roger (talk) 09:58, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Following the above section about England, there is very little discussion about the Welsh capital. Unless I am overlooking something, Cardiff is just assumed to be the capital, and I think a strong case could be made for calling London the actual capital of Wales. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 09:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
"During the Troubles in Northern Ireland, London was hit from 1973 by bomb attacks by the Provisional Irish Republican Army."
Change "was hit from 1973 by bomb attacks" to "was hit by bomb attacks in 1973". Raillair (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Partly done: The previous wording was using "from" in the sense of "starting in" (the following sentence makes it clear that the bombings continued after 1973), but I agree that the wording was still confusing, so I tweaked it to make it hopefully a bit clearer. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply