Talk:Logorrhea
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 4 January 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Logorrhea (psychology) to Logorrhea. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Literal meaning?
[edit]Intro: logorrhea or logorrhoea (from Ancient Greek λόγος logos and ῥέω rheo "to flow")
"Rheo", to flow, is pretty clear but "logos", meaning what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.24.37 (talk) 16:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Logos means "word". WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:12, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Requested move 4 January 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vestrian24Bio 10:16, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
Logorrhea (psychology) → Logorrhea – Seems to be kind of a WP:SURPRISE situation that this subject is not at the base title. The only other title on the disambiguation page, Verbosity, though itself has a similar amount of page views as Logorrhea (psychology), when considering how many people will attempt to look up the word "Logorrhea" to arrive at Verbosity, apparently represented by the redirect Logorrhea (rhetoric), it seems to be used very seldom if ever (page views). Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. NightWolf1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 03:34, 10 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:06, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support WikiNav appears to indicate that most if not all outgoing pageviews went to the psychology term. This is a WP:ONEOTHER situation at best. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:19, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose. The verbosity meaning has just as much long-term significance. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support. There is no other article titled Logorrhea. The most that is needed is a hatnote pointing to verbosity. - Station1 (talk) 04:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- We only use a hatnote if one topic is more notable than the other, even if only one has an article under that title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom and Zxcvbnm. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 04:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose per Necrothesp. I agree that normally this would just be a cause for a hatnote, but it would be an awkward one. It's easiest to just have a small disambig page so that casual use of the term is disambiguated, as in casual use it just means verbosity. SnowFire (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Medicine/Neurology task force, WikiProject Psychology, and WikiProject Medicine have been notified of this discussion. Vestrian24Bio 04:06, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support per https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Logorrhea This is what readers are looking for, so let's get them directly here. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support: Logorrhea is not the common name for verbosity, according to Ngrams. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 05:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- This ngrams shows that "verbosity" is a more common word, but that's irrelevant. The question is what topic someone typing in "logorrhea" might expect to find. This ngrams shows that "fate" is more common than "destiny" but they still mean the same thing and one redirects to the other on Wikipedia. SnowFire (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support per WhatamIdoing and everyone else's points.¿VØ!D? ☄ 13:08, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
