Talk:Lockheed Martin

Advanced technology center

There appears to be no mention about the previously stated technology center, which is headquartered in Palo Alto and has multiplce facilities around the country. Here is the link to its homepage(apologies idk how to cite a page)https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/space/atc.html, I'm not entirely sure how similar this is to the ATL division but I thought it was a good idea to just bring it up. Another random person 42 (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2025 and 23 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LunaMichelle03 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by TradingRoom54 (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

undefined named references "NYT" and "Shadow"

@OmniFrieza994: In the revision of 12:10, 19 March 2025, there are "ref" tags added which refer to "NYT" and "shadow", but references using these tags were not added or previously defined. Fabrickator (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Readability of the second paragraph

The second paragraph should probably be simplified or moved to table, as the amount of links is almost unreadable. Xianyu20 (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Industry terminology

Addressing reversion by Fnlayson--why should the lead use the term 'defense' when english wikipedia uses 'arms'? The pipe directs to 'arms industry' and both use american english. 81567518W (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Lockheed Martin is an American corporation with most of its facilities in the US. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:28, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, as I stated both articles use American English. 81567518W (talk) 15:37, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Unless there are additional thoughts here will plan to change this back to conform with the referenced page and for clarity and specificity. 81567518W (talk) 14:36, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

• One person is not a consensus to change though. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

  You haven't explained why we wouldn't want to use the term 'arms' when 1. that appears to be preferred style, and 2. it is clearer and more specific. 81567518W (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

• "Defense" has been the common terminology in the US since the 1990s or before. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Lockheed is an arms manufacturer but far from just an arms manufacturer.

The only (vague and no offense irrelevant) argument I've heard since circa January 2025 for such changes is the irrelevant to us and legally non-binding Department of War rebranding stuff that has no power in our US-based legal system - POTUS and Secretary of Defense live in a tiny little box with limited leg room.

What motivates the ask? — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:28, 7 July 2026 (UTC)