Talk:Lochinver

second largest fishing port in Scotland

Is this true? I haven't been there for a long time so it's clearly grown a lot in recent decades but a source would still be useful here.--JBellis 21:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

It is true - however the large building is a white elephant - and mostly empty and unused. Fishing quotas have dropped and no UK fishing boats use it - except for prawns. So whilst it is the second largest fishing port - it is mostly empty and could easily operate at less than half the size. If the disused parts were to be dismantled the views across the Loch from the hotel could be restored to former stunning vista's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecaberfeidh (talk • contribs) 12:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

In what sense is (or was) it the second largest? In terms of wharf area and size of fish market buildings it was always much smaller than Frazerburgh and Peterhead and they, together with Lerwick had higher landings. Northern rock (talk) 20:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lochinver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081018032704/http://www.stevenson.co.nz///corporate/agriculture.php to http://www.stevenson.co.nz/corporate/agriculture.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)