Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d29d9bade6019

Jump to content

Talk:Lizard complex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Mikenorton in topic Rename to "Lizard Complex"

If it had a reference or source this could be easily rated as B. GB 10:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article is almost completely unreferenced. Also makes no mention of the Lizard missing a number of features which are required for a complex to be classed completely as an ophiolite. Too many affinities are made with SSZ ophiolites where as the Lizard has more in common with dismembered Alpine type ophiolites, which are generally not related to Supra-Subduction zones. ClimberDave 19:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Porthallow

[edit]

There are two Porthallows on the south coast of Cornwall. Perhaps amend map to indicate St Keverne or Porthoustock, which are unique reference points?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.182.58 (talk)

The other Porthallow is so far away, I can't see it causing confusion. Mikenorton (talk) 15:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rename to "Lizard Complex"

[edit]

I propose that the article be renamed to "Lizard Complex" as that capitalisation is used in the great majority of sources. Mikenorton (talk) 16:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply