Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21ee9e94bfb5c4f

Jump to content

Talk:Liverpool Express

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by FOXSOUNDZ in topic Incorrect Download Chart claims

Assessment & cleanup

[edit]

I just did a little cleanup on this article, description follows...

  • Copyvio - The huge chunk of "history" text was removed due to being a copyvio (copy/paste) of http://www.liverpoolexpress.com/brandnew/history.swf
  • Overlinking - Once a word / phrase / person has been Wikilinked in an article, you do not need to do so again when the word / phrase / person is mentioned again...
  • Ref cleanup - I moved the ref RE: the chart positions inline with each instance that it was needed...
  • Stub - I am not comfortable assessing this article any higher than a stub in it's (new) current condition... If the history can be re-written (without copyvio), a few more refs added, and maybe cleanup the discography a little (tables make things pretty), it could be a decent start...

Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need help with anything... - Adolphus79 (talk) 04:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liverpool Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Download Chart claims

[edit]

During 2006, the song "It's a Beautiful Day" appeared on several TV commercials in the UK and parts of Europe. This led to the track entering the digital download charts.[citation needed]

Five years later, the song "You Are My Love" topped the digital download charts following a re-run of a Top of the Pops episode they had appeared on thirty years before.


Much as I love Liverpool Express, the above two claims should be removed. The uncited first claim is incorrect - the song did not appear in the Official Download chart during 2006. The second claim, parroted word for word across several sites on the internet is also wrong. The questionable source says nothing about it reaching number one. It actually never made the Top 100. Downloads were the most popular form of music consumption in 2011 so any number one download would have appeared fairly high in the overall chart, which this track did not.

Also basic maths is wrong - "30 years before" "5 years later" than 2006 is 1981, not 1976 when they appeared on TOTP. FOXSOUNDZ (talk) 10:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'll remove the whole download section in a couple of weeks if no-one comes back with verifiable dates & positions. I'll leave the remaining bit about the band still playing gigs where it is as it will be under "Reunion", which is probably where it was in the first place! FOXSOUNDZ (talk) 10:36, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply