Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a222f33b3dc6c465

Jump to content

Talk:LiveJournal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Livingroom Productions in topic 2nd image is too low-quality
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 18, 2008Peer reviewReviewed

Wrong Percentages

[edit]

Well, if the total of users is about 16.000.000, ~3.000.000 of USA users can't be the 67% ... Just correct your data, men!

Block in China

[edit]

I just checked and LJ is not blocked in China now. No sources to back this up, but I'm in China and I can load it. 222.128.101.35 (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Did you remove it from the table? I wish I saw this talk first. How weird that I didn’t see it when scrolling until I accidentally made a new topic. I even did the find in page thing. ~2026-36400-79 (talk) 00:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Early history - LiveJournal under Brad Fitzpatrick

[edit]

Right now, the history section pretty much starts with the acquisition by Six Apart, does anyone have any good sources for the early history of LiveJournal under Brad Fitzpatrick and Danga Interactive? I haven't had any luck on Google News Search. -- Gordon Ecker, WikiSloth (talk) 07:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

LJ

[edit]

I could have sworn LJ was originally on this list…?

I (re?)added LJ and used this site to test, https://www.cloudwards.net/tools/chinese-firewall-test/.

~2026-36400-79 (talk) 00:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

2nd image is too low-quality

[edit]

The image that showcases LiveJournal’s homepage is too low-quality for people to study it well. Perhaps a higher-quality one would work better? Livingroom Productions (talk) 06:47, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply