Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 17 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ashspears6284(article contribs).
I'd say it is. Nuclear fission was the very bleeding edge of science at the time. Nobel Prizes were awarded for it, and a new element was created for it. The folks who designed them were scientists. They even called it a "physics package". What do you reckon? John (talk) 21:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The new images, like this one, look terrible. The source they are from is an "AI upscale" that has clearly hallucinated details — look at the text, including the "L11" writing on the bomb. They should be removed and replaced with images that, whatever their "lower" quality, do not have the unnatural smoothing, poor text rendering, and incorrect faces (the guy at the left is Norman Ramsey and looks nothing like him because the "AI" algorithm has just smeared a lot of pixels and made guesses based on nothing). These are deeply ugly at best, misleading at worst, and should be tagged as AI generated/edited at a minimum. It is not as if the article does not have plenty of images as it is. NuclearSecrets (talk) 23:52, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I agree that it was correct to remove these images, under MOS:AIUPSCALE. Note that they were added by User:NotLessOrEqual evading their 2024 block as User:Colimarl. They'd taken a lot of public domain military videos from YouTube, cropped them to remove any watermarks or timecodes that the channels might have included, then asked an AI to upscale them. I'll flag these for deletion on Commons. Belbury (talk) 11:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply