Talk:Lithium

Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2024

i like fortnite

reduced cortical lithium

A single 2025 study connects reduced cortical lithium with Alzheimers disease. Is it appropriate? This is a primary source, no review, odds are it will fail to be reproduced. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:12, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

No, per WP:MEDPRIMARY. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Article review

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

• There are uncited statements, including entire paragraphs.
• There is an "expand section" orange banner at the top of "pricing": is this still valid?
• At the end of the astronomical section I find "found to may" which needs repair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-96700-2 (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 05:06, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Lithium

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Issues remain unaddressed, no ongoing effort to fix them. TompaDompa (talk) 22:58, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

There are uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. There is an "expand section" orange banner at the top of "pricing": is this still valid? Z1720 (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The article is in a sorry state, looks like the typical case of crust accumulation without any major rewrite or update to keep it as a coherent whole... I also see a lot of MOS violations, some duplicate refs, and other issues that I do not think can be remediated without major effort. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅📬⋅📜 15:29, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Error in figure "Scatter plots of lithium grade and tonnage for selected world deposits, as of 2017"

This figure has logarithmic y axes, but the tickmarks get wider and narrower in the wrong direction. I have uploaded a corrected version of the figure to Wikimedia Commons. However, the page is semi-protected, and I cannot edit it, probably because I am considered a new editor. I'm not a frequent editor, so it may take some time for me to be "confirmed". Should I request that another editor replace the original figure with the corrected one? Thank you. CopperChemist (talk) 23:43, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done thanks Johnjbarton (talk) 01:06, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much. CopperChemist (talk) 03:07, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

El Maco

He play the counter strikes ~2026-41948-80 (talk) 21:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)