Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2aae64d782a26ee

Jump to content

Talk:Literature review

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[untitled]

[edit]

Could someone add up to the information please?--Quinlan Vos 14:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

[untitled]

[edit]

how is it possible to retrieve from the link below? It asks for a password. thanks in advance  Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.17.95.236 (talk) 14:18, 18 January 2007‎ (UTC)Reply

I moved the link from article here since it is mostly useless and hard to verify.
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed Further Reading Citation

[edit]

I removed from the extra readings this citation: taneka.j 1999 because it is incomplete. Does anyone know the title of this? Roseclearfield (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Review vs. systematic review vs. meta-analysis

[edit]

Literature review vs. systematic review vs. survey article vs. meta-analysis should be differentiated more exactly, taking into account, that the definitions may vary based between and within fields of knowledge. A short summary of the differences may be sufficient for this article, the more narrow articles could provide further details. However, current differentiation by me is not enough, a bit more is needed. Forp (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC) (Edited Feb 18)Reply