Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d054d0d816483

Jump to content

Talk:List of tools for static code analysis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by ~2026-56581-1 in topic ruff

IKOS

[edit]

Hi,

I noticed that there is no link to IKOS. It's a static analyzer built by NASA.

I don't feel comfortable adding it myself: I didn't create IKOS, but I recently became the maintainer. And I fully understand that this is not a link farm. So, I prefer to let someone else decide.

  • It's a formal methods tool based on abstract interpretation.
  • It has 1.9K stars on github.
  • It's actively developed.

Perhaps someone else can review it and determine if it should be listed.

IvanPerez (talk) 01:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

This is a list of tools with a preexisting Wikipedia article of their own. MrOllie (talk) 01:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I see. Thanks for the clarification. Some of the comments above were also referring to how notable the tool is, which made it sound like an article was not a requirement -- hence my confusion.
I do want to bring up that, if you look through the list, you'll see that some tools were added by the creators of the tools themselves. For example, at first glance I just saw that Yasca's article was added by Michael Scovetta, one of the creators. Is that allowed? Also, the tool is retired, archived, and has seen no changes in more than 6 years.
I don't have anything against that tool or the creator. I didn't even know the tool existed until know. It was just the first one I noticed. But perhaps a review of either the tools, or the criteria to include them, is warranted. IvanPerez (talk) 02:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Those edits would not be in keeping with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines, though standards were more lax back in 2008 when the Yasca article was created. MrOllie (talk) 03:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fortify SAST tool

[edit]

This is a major tool used across DOD for all major languages - it is missing entirely from this article. There is also a separate Wiki article on Fortify Software (SAST and DAST), which references this page. 65.127.122.221 (talk) 23:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is a list of tools with preexisting Wikipedia articles. An article on a software company isn't the same as an article on the tool. See WP:NOTINHERITED. MrOllie (talk) 23:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

One column for ada and major languages in others?

[edit]

Major modern languages are grouped together (and missing quite some tools) in "others" while honorable but anecdotic Ada has a column on its own? B1ack5un (talk) 13:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

ruff

[edit]

https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff python linter ~2026-56581-1 (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply