Talk:List of hypothetical technologies

Plausibility

Article quote: Hypothetical technologies are technologies that do not exist yet, but that could exist in the future. How do you determine "could exist"? I will use two examples from this list: Artificial General Intelligence is certainly plausible. An object weighing several pounds displaying human level intelligence can exist...there are eight billion existence proofs walking around. Faster than light communication would require our understanding of physics, and even the logic of causality, to be wrong on a very fundamental level...it should be as impossible as computing the last digit of pi. Where do you draw the line?

No longer hypothetical - Female Sperm

Female sperm has been successfully made in mice as of 2018. See Female sperm Benx45h (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Anticarcinogen

I've removed this for a rather complex reason. Any entry in this list must be a technology that doesn't already exist, and it must be backed-up by a Wikipedia article (i.e. blue-linked) or a source. In the case of Anticarcinogen there is a wikipedia article, but it lacks any source except a dictionary definition, so we're relying on the blue-link rather than any source being available. The problem with the Wikipedia page on anticarcinogens, and the source it uses (the dictionary definition) is that neither says that anticarcinogens don't yet exist, and are merely a hypothetical technology yet to be developed. In fact, the article says that health claims for anticarcinogens are regulated by the FDA etc., which implies that such claims are being made, and therefore that someone thinks they have developed an anticarcinogen. Therefore we can only have it in this list if someone can find a source that indicates that the FDA has currently refused all possible usages of the term on the grounds that no one has yet made an anticarcinogen. Is this the case? We can't say they're hypothetical simply because we don't believe the claims. Elemimele (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

A follow-up; a Google search for anticarcinogen food supplements indicates that claims of the practical existence of anticarcinogens are certainly numerous! Elemimele (talk) 17:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Creating Pages for Red links

Should articles of the technologies that are red linked be made? Are there more sources besides the links next to them that can warrant article creations? FireInMe (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)