Talk:List of human evolution fossils
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of human evolution fossils article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
please add to list
[edit]section on La Brea woman, a 9000 year old specimen and the only human remains ever discovered in the La Brea tarpits in los angeles, california.
Map discoveries
[edit]I would love to see a map that identifies the locations where the remains have been found. I am especially curious about the concentration of the discoveries on certain geographic locations.
If you pursue this, it would be interesting to indicate the age of the remains (maybe color-coded).
Thanks for your great work!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.89.74.165 (talk • contribs) 10:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Some age assertions
[edit]I'm no expert buy in reaction to an appearance on my watchlist I just made this edit to another article where the age of Homo luzonensis is asserted to be 134,000 years, citing a 2023 study. I see that the Homo luzonensis article agrees with this. This article puts it at about 50,000 years. I took a quick look at the article cited and it looks to me as if info inthere may impact other fossils, but someone who knows more about this stuff than I should fix this stuff if it needs fixing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Change the image at the top of the page
[edit]It shows a T Rex fossil, which isn't related to human evolution. Oo Uui (talk) 15:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Pay a bit more attention to the elements of the page. The image in question is part of Template:Paleontology, not part of this article. The same image will be displayed in whatever page uses the template. Dimadick (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Dimadick Oh ok Oo Uui (talk) 15:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- List-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- High-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
- List-Class Archaeology articles
- High-importance Archaeology articles
- List-Class Anthropology articles
- High-importance Anthropology articles
- List-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- List-Class Palaeontology articles
- High-importance Palaeontology articles
- List-Class Palaeontology articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- List-Class Primate articles
- Mid-importance Primate articles
- WikiProject Primates articles
- List-Class List articles
- Mid-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles