Talk:List of future Interstate Highways

Interstate 67, 92, 98 and 99 removal

These aren't congressionally designated, and their projects have been rejected years ago Breck0530 (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Correct, they should be removed. --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

I'm restoring the first I-67. It was part of the original plans for the system, and removing it creates a gap in coverage of the concept of that number. Imzadi 1979 → 01:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

ok but there is no future interstate mile marker for interstate 380 Breck0530 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

and should I add a subtitle called history for interstate 67 and move the first proposed there? Breck0530 (talk) 03:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Moving the 67 and 99 to other proposals

I will create a new section that describes other possible proposals and move 67 and 99 there. Breck0530 (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Wait actually never mind. They already discussed it. Breck0530 (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lists of Interstate Highways which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:34, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

"Interstate 50" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Interstate 50 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 21 § Interstate 50 until a consensus is reached. TheAuroraBorealis (u/t/c) 20:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

I-47 Bill

There has been a bill submitted to the US Senate proposing a future I-47 along most of what is currently US-287, intentionally named after President Donald J Trump. Since this is a bill and not signed into law, I would not advise adding it to the list at the current moment unless further consensus deems otherwise. If it becomes an issue regarding vandalism, would this be grounds for requesting temporary semi-protection?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4484/text Interstate24 (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Why not add it? Proposed bills have been posted on here regardless of adoption. – The Grid (talk) 17:13, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Regarding potential vandalism, that is predicting the future, which Wikipedia doesn't allow. Now that this proposed corridor finally has a number, I think it should be added. I don't see why this would be any different from the proposed I-3 being named for Georgia's 3rd infantry division. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)