Talk:List of communist ideologies

Redundant?

This looks like a copy of the list in Communism. I do not believe we need the same list in two places. Alex O. (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

What should be done (no pun intedented) is to expand this list, it really doesn't include many communist ideologies (Marxism, Castroism, Guevarism, Socialism with Chinese characteristics, Ho Chi Minh Thought, National communism, Left communism, Primitive communism, Scientific communism, Autonomism, Situationism, Libertarian Marxism, Neo-Marxism, National Bolshevism, Goulash Communism, De Leonism, Khrushchevism, Shachtmanism, ect.). Charles Essie (talk) 21:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of communist ideologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051211121016/http://libcom.org/library/ to http://www.libcom.org/library

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Juche?

Why is there no section on the Juche ideology? Seems like this would be extremely relevant, not to mention worthy of a brief description, with how easy it is to misunderstand the ideas involved. 150.131.96.92 (talk) 21:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Other forms to potentially add

Strains of Libertarian Marxism:

• • Autonomism
  • Frankfurt School
  • Freudo-Marxism
  • Impossibilism
  • Johnson–Forest Tendency
  • Left communism
  • Lettrism
  • Marxist humanism
  • New Left
  • Situationism
  • Socialisme ou Barbarie
  • Solidarity
  • Ultra-leftism
  • Workerism

-- Cdjp1 (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:List of communist ideologies/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 20:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

This looks like a very useful article. Some first thoughts:

• If this is a list, then it can't possibly be a Good Article, because only articles become good articles. You would have to nominate at Featured lists. However, this does not precisely look like a list to me, so I wonder if the title should be changed? If you decide to change the title, please wait until the review is completed, otherwise we get technical issues.
• The next bigger (but again not unsolvable) problem I see is the lead. See MOS:Lead, this section should be a summary of the whole article. All information provided in the lead should be repeated in the text. Instead, you are using the lead as an introduction/background section.
• That brings me to my next point: Better have an actual section "Background", where you can provide more general information, maybe including a general history stating when and why ideologies emerged and to what events they are related, etc. A nice extensive section here to get a good overview, and understand connections, before going into the separate ideologies. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
• It seems to me that the article still has some way to go to reach GA criterion 1 "well written". As an example, see the first paragraph of the section "Juche":
  • The paragraph lacks a red thread, it seems to contain of unconnected sentences in a random order;
  • The quote lacks attribution
  • There are incomplete sentences: "Though many critics point out the lack of Marxist-Leninist theory in Juche."
• There are a number of missing citations (all information should have inline citations)
• So in sum, I think this still needs quite some work to reach GA level. In particular, the article needs a careful copy edit for language and text flow. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 13:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

@Jens Lallensack:, hmmm yeah I can see the issues. This is gonna be a lot of work to do, and I'm not gonna get it done in the time frame, so I'll keep working to C/E the text and work on better structuring the article to resubmit for consideration next year (cause an article can only be nominated once a year iirc). --Cdjp1 (talk) 20:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

@Cdjp1: Ok, I will fail it then; I also think this might be best, as it just takes away the pressure and commitment. But you don't have to wait a year for renominating, you can renominate as soon as you resolved the issues. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Closing note: Nomination withdrawn. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Thomas-sankara-dessin.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Mao Zedong sitting (3x4 cropped)(2).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 19 February 2026 (UTC)