Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23212a72e086483

Jump to content

Talk:List of ciphertexts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by GordyBeefPasta in topic Philipp Harland?

Criterion for notability

[edit]

As someone who maintains a list of "Famous Unsolved Codes" , I'd like to start a discussion to head off a future problem. Specifically, if my own email queue is any indication, there are going to be many people who write their own codes, and then try to list them on this page as a "famous ciphertext". So, do we want to try to come up with some sort of minimum standard for listing here? Or will it be sufficient just for a ciphertext to already have its own article elsewhere on Wikipedia? I'd recommend something like a minimum number of mentions in respected cryptographic press or reference works. Otherwise this list is going to get polluted by a lot of snake oil in short order. Or do we want that, in order to have a comprehensive list? I can go either way, I just strongly recommend having a clearly stated set of standards, because I know how aggressive some of the "code spammers" are going to be once they find this page. --Elonka 03:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think that a necessary, although maybe not sufficient, criterion is that the ciphertext must have been published or discussed in some respectable, notable publication. Matt Crypto 17:54, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
At minimum, the ciphertext must be ones that has their own article on Wikipedia. —Lowellian (reply) 06:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

The image File:Dorabella.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Question

[edit]

Why is this a distinct page from 'famous ciphertexts' on Ciphertext? Jackiespeel (talk) 08:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tamam Shud ciphertext is solved

[edit]

http://ronja.twibright.com/somerton.php  Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.53.146.14 (talk) 23:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

That link just gives a long list of guesses made by filling in arbitrary letters, not any actual solutions. —Lowellian (reply) 17:28, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Philipp Harland?

[edit]

Did Phil really "solve" P. Oxy. 90, or is his solution just more snake oil bs? As an unsolved puzzles nerd, people like him really infuriate me, especially when they're vindicated by laymen e.g. the con artist Ahmet Ardich.

I don't wanna seem offensive or incendiary, I just think Philipp doesn't have the proper training to tackle this problem. GordyBeefPasta (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply