Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21ed4105b19b5b3

Jump to content

Talk:Linearized augmented-plane-wave method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by GreSebMic in topic too-technical tag

too-technical tag

[edit]

Someone placed a too-technical tag on this article without leaving an explanation on the details of the perceived problem on this talk page. According to the description of this tag, such an explanation should be given and according to the advises when to remove a tag a missing explanation may be reason enough to remove it.

I nevertheless want to take this tag as an occasion to improve the article in the direction of a better readability for the widest reasonable audience that can be assumed. Of course, this is a very technical topic that cannot be accessible to everyone. In my opinion the widest reasonable audience that should be able to read at least some parts of the article is university students who get confronted with density functional theory in their studies and researchers from other fields who read an article in which the LAPW method is mentioned. The main audience are Master- and PhD students and researchers who directly get confronted with the LAPW method and want to know more about the topic when they stumble upon it. Of course, I might have forgotten certain groups to whom this article is of interest.

I would like to have as much input as possible on issues of this article. If you feel like you should be able to understand this article, but have difficulties with some aspects, please comment here on your background and on the article aspects that require improvement. Please also comment if you feel that certain subtopics are missing.

Of course, if you feel that the article fulfills your expectations and needs, positive feedback is also welcome. :) GreSebMic (talk) 10:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply