Talk:Lindbergh Beacon
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Lindbergh Beacon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
.
| On 26 January 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Lindbergh Beacon (Los Angeles) to Lindbergh Beacon. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 26 January 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 23:57, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Lindbergh Beacon (Los Angeles) → Lindbergh Beacon – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as the only other article currently listed at the disambiguation page "Lindbergh Beacon" is a single-source paragraph in another article, which can be accomodated by simply adding this hatnote to this article: {{about|the aircraft beacon in Los Angeles|the one in Chicago|Palmolive Building#Lindbergh Beacon}}. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support, given that the Chicago beacon has no article. The hatnote will suffice. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 16:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom. A hatnote is fine. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2026 (UTC)


