Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a251d9838c32a140

Jump to content

Talk:Library of Pantainos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Projethomere in topic Tables

Tables

[edit]

The article currently includes a set of inscriptions given using a table (encoded in plain html) instead of the usual templates for translated quotes or even a proper wikitable. Such ersatz tables make WP less accessible for people who use screen readers.

Projethomere argues that this is necessary in order retain the "epigraphic writing engraved on the marble." This writing is (a) unlikely to be of much use to a non-specialist audience and (b) obvious to a specialist from the Greek text given. It is (c) not an accurate diplomatic transcription of what is engraved on the marble, anyway, since the current version of the WP page adds spaces, brackets, punctuation, and diaresis (which are not present on the stone) and replaces line breaks with "|" symbols. Furius (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Anyone who isn't interested in ancient libraries needn't read this kind of article - just as anyone who doesn't like mathematics won't be looking for articles on mathematics - The epigraphic writing is important here because it gives a better idea of the reality of the site.
I would obviously have preferred a Commons image of the epigraphs. Projethomere (talk) 21:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
No, we write for a general audience not just people who know ancient Greek; this article is equally likely to be read by tourists visiting Athens, for example. Anyway, it's not giving "a better idea of the reality of the site": it has spaces, brackets, punctuation, and diaresis which are not present on the stones and it gives line breaks that are totally different from the actual stone.
You have totally ignored the point about accessibility. Furius (talk) 00:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's a personal point of view - as someone who lives there, I'm in a better position to know the reality of the place, and tourists see two epigraphs in capital letters and not in small letters. Projethomere (talk) 00:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply