Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245bc1aaf8d1528

Jump to content

Talk:Liberalism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by The Four Deuces in topic I've been trying to edit this article.
Former featured article candidateLiberalism is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 23, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 5, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
March 6, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 9, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
April 30, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
July 12, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Europe and Latin America, is reductive

[edit]

Quote: "Modern usage and definitions In Europe and Latin America, " Should include: Japan, Australia, South korea, Russia, The whole of south-east asia. When Liberal or liberalism is used it means center-right. ~2025-32507-85 (talk)


No sources for liberal feminism

[edit]

Being liberal is a political position on the political scale that is center toward the middle. The stance in the article is far left "Liberal feminism, the dominant tradition in feminist history, is an individualistic form of feminist theory that focuses on women's ability to maintain their equality through their actions and choices. Liberal feminists hope to eradicate all barriers to gender equality, claiming that the continued existence of such barriers eviscerates the individual rights and freedoms ostensibly guaranteed by a liberal social order." Please refer to the political spectrum before you radicalize the paper. thank you https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-spectrum 2603:7000:B901:8500:A50C:5B0D:F547:78DB (talk) 01:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You sure? . YBSOne (talk) 08:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Do you know what the term far left means? OmegaAOL (talk) 01:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI edits/rewrites

[edit]

Hi - I tagged this article as AI generated; this is only a suspicion and not proof, but the recent edits by Ksh.andronexus show several indications of potential LLM use and thus need review for accuracy, tone, AI-generated "original research," sourcing issues, etc. Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Unsupported attributions in Social democracy

[edit]

"with one political scientist[who?] calling American liberalism "bootleg social democracy" "

Linked source is: Susser, Bernard. Political ideology in the modern world. Upper Saddle River: Allyn and Bacon, 1995. ISBN 0-02-418442-X. p. 110.

The original source says "American welfare liberalism has in fact been viewed as a bootleg social democracy.", the author is Bernard Susser, same as the source. That part should be edited. CloudUchiha (talk) 02:17, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've been trying to edit this article.

[edit]

It is hard to understand why there are so few posts here in Talk, none at all for many months last year, and none at all for the past month. And yet, in that time, there have been major changes to the article. Any suggestions why this is? Rick Norwood (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I cannot see any major changes, although there have been numerous small changes. The main criticism I have of the article is the removal of the observation that liberalism is based on equality, which was replaced by equality before the law. The reason liberals support equality before the law is that they believe all humans are equal.
Liberals of course differ on the consequences that humans are equal, but don't question it. Jim Crow for example was defended on the basis of "separate but equal." Of course we can challenge the authenticity of that claim, but it is important that the proponents could only argue on liberal precepts. TFD (talk) 04:57, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply