Talk:Lexovisaurus
Add topicLatest comment: 13 years ago by FunkMonk in topic MNHN pictures
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
MNHN pictures
[edit]The Paris pictures are apparently those of the remains found in 1955 at Argences by Roger Brun, which until 2005 were present at the Le Havre museum.--MWAK (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- So they may rather belong in Loricatosaurus? FunkMonk (talk) 10:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well...they could obviously be used to illustrate the Loricatosaurus article. However, many researchers see no need for a split and keep using Lexovisaurus as a name for the entirety of the British and French material. As they would form an illustration of this fact, the images have their rightful place in the Lexovisaurus article also. BTW, my congratulations with the "Dutch Pigeon" article :o)!--MWAK (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll add the images there too. And thanks, heheh, perhaps you know the answer to this? FunkMonk (talk) 14:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well...they could obviously be used to illustrate the Loricatosaurus article. However, many researchers see no need for a split and keep using Lexovisaurus as a name for the entirety of the British and French material. As they would form an illustration of this fact, the images have their rightful place in the Lexovisaurus article also. BTW, my congratulations with the "Dutch Pigeon" article :o)!--MWAK (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)