Talk:Lexi Thompson

Proposed Name Change

I propose that the name of this article be changed to Lexi Thompson to reflect the more common use of her name as seen on her official web site -- http://lexithompson.com/ --Crunch (talk) 01:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

There has been no comment for three weeks. The change will be made. --Crunch (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Discuss including table of professional results while not affiliated with a Tour

Please give your opinion on this table:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lexi_Thompson&oldid=451662818#Professional_record_and_earnings_outside_of_Tour_membership

I believe it provides a useful way to summarize the career of the handful of professional golfers who play for a year or more not affiliated with any tour. These include Thompson, Michelle Wie and Tadd Fujikawa. Because they are not affiliated with a major tour, the information can't be found easily anywhere else. --Crunch (talk) 21:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Question - To those editors that oppose inclusion of this table: what is the objection? Is the problem that the table contains "minor" tournaments? Or that the table is too large? --Noleander (talk) 22:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Comment - I'm not sure what the question is either. I don't have a problem with the table per se, however the information still needs to be referenced. If the table is felt to be too long, it could always be spun out to a separate article. --Deadly∀ssassin 23:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

• Keep table - Most other articles on golfers to have similar tables, so I see no harm in including this table. If her career goes on, and the table gets too large, the minor/amateur events can be moved to a subarticle, or whatever. But that is way off in the future. So, unless someone points out a strong reason to delete the table, I think it should stay. --Noleander (talk) 23:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

• Delete table:::The table in question is either trivia or already covered in other parts of the article.

1 Approximately half the results are minor league golf tournaments. Minor league sports results aren't notable with the exception of Thompson's one victory which is listed in her professional wins section.

2 Thompson's LPGA Tournament results are included in her LPGA Summary box or her win box. Active pro golfers have a box where there results are summarized, plus boxes for wins and playoff results(A playoff loss is notable). Golfers from Tiger Woods down to the journeyman pro with one career PGA Tour win don't have their results listed from week to week event to event etc etc. A win and playoff box and a yearly summary is considered sufficient by golf editors not just myself. The narrative parts of the article can be used for pointing out other noteworthy happenings that the other boxes don't sufficiently provide for. I add things to golfer articles all the time things like- He was the 18 and 36 hole leader at the 19?? PGA Championship before going on finish tied for 19th. See Gary Hallberg and Jeff Mitchell for examples

Crunch will raise the point that this kind of table is present in articles on Michelle Wie and Todd Fujiawra. I'll argue they shouldn't be there either. Is a golfer missing the cut notable? 70 or so golfers have this happen to them at most PGA Tour and LPGA Tour events. Is a golfer finishing T31st or 10 shots back notable? It's all WP:recentism or sports results which I'll get to in a moment. Ms. Thompson is a celebrity because of the golf talent she has at her age. She has one major league professional win, there are hundreds of golfers with just as many or more and some of them are quite young also Do they all warrant coverage in such minutaie?

Thompson's overall results are covered in the other sections of the article and in the long narrative, mostly written by Crunch.

2 The strongest argument against the table is WP:What wikipedia is not or namely the section on an indiscriminate collection of information. A table of all golf results fits the build. Where do we say enough is enough? When Ms. Thompson retires?- William 13:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

William: Why do you call sports results of an athlete "trivia"? Her childhood spelling bee results might be trivia, but not golf results. Why do you say the contents of the table are "not notable"? The WP notability requirement applies only to entire articles, not to individual sentences or paragraphs within an article (see WP:NNC for details). --Noleander (talk) 00:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

• Keep table, on the condition that it is sourced. I don't think her professional golf results can reasonably be said to be trivia, and I support the inclusion of the table. I was going to say that it could be collapsed to improve readability, but actually I see this is discouraged as per WP:COLLAPSE. I agree with Noleander, if it gets too big in the future, the thing to do might be to move it to a sub-article. However, it really needs better sourcing, and I will note that any results not sourced can be challenged and removed per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Regards — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 05:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

• Comment - The table's info should absolutely be sourced if it is to stay. A lighter background color for the 2011 records would be really helpful on the eyes, I might add. I am reluctant to outright oppose the exclusion of minor league scores for golfers of note, but it most certainly shouldn't be a requirement (not that anyone's advocating that). Enderandpeter (talk) 22:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Keep if verifiable - the details are significant to the subject of the article. Rich Farmbrough, 15:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC).
  

• Conclusion. After two months of discussion, the consensus seems to be Keep. The section has been re-added and I am working to add complete citations. Please be patient while we complete the citations. To Enderandpeter's point, each year is in a separate color. Is this what you had in mind or something else? --Crunch (talk) 04:30, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Also, to William who asked, "Where do we say enough is enough? When Ms. Thompson retires?" This table specifically documents results in tournaments played outside of Tour membership. Results as an LPGA, or other Tour, member are listed separately and as a result, this table will have few additions fro this point onward. --Crunch (talk) 05:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Where are all those vital results now, @Crunch:...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Preposterous

A table half consisting of minor league golf results. Can anyone besides myself see how truly insignificant this is? A table on Tiger Woods making over 140 straight cuts, Jane Blalock's 299(!) tournament streak, Byron Nelson's 11 consecutive tournament winning streak, golfers who won 10 or more tournaments in a year. Now those would be worthwhile for what was done was momentous unlike finishing 10 shots back in a minor league golf tournament. If someone would step back and weigh what the Thompson chart denotes and look at golf historically instead of being focused on recentism, well they'd see how absurd the chronicling is.- William 19:12, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Lexi Thompson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110902010731/http://www.lpga.com:80/content/Alltimerecords.pdf to http://lpga.com/content/Alltimerecords.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110918145730/http://www.lpga.com:80/content_1.aspx?pid=29657&mid=1 to http://www.lpga.com/content_1.aspx?pid=29657&mid=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Lexi Thompson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080702021516/http://www.pgatour.com/players/02/87/80/ to http://www.pgatour.com/players/02/87/80/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060510124340/http://www.floridajuniortour.org/players/viewPlayer.asp?pID=24415 to http://www.floridajuniortour.org/players/viewPlayer.asp?pID=24415
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100619124650/http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/professional/shoprite-lpga-classic-paula-creamer-and-alexis-thompson-a-bit-of-agony-and-ecstasy to http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/professional/shoprite-lpga-classic-paula-creamer-and-alexis-thompson-a-bit-of-agony-and-ecstasy
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100821045347/http://www.lpga.com/content/RolexRankings7-26-2010.pdf to http://www.lpga.com/content/RolexRankings7-26-2010.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110126012519/http://www.thegolfchannel.com/tour-insider/lpga-denies-thompsons-petition-sponsor-exemptions-41053/ to http://www.thegolfchannel.com/tour-insider/lpga-denies-thompsons-petition-sponsor-exemptions-41053/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110511022910/http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/fromthebunker/2011/04/20/lexi-thompson-eager-to-return-to-work-next-week/ to http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/fromthebunker/2011/04/20/lexi-thompson-eager-to-return-to-work-next-week/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114024655/http://www.ladieseuropeantour.com/main_article.php?id=56839&pid=1001 to http://www.ladieseuropeantour.com/main_article.php?id=56839&pid=1001

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Inclusion of Professional record and earnings outside of Tour membership

I am a little bit skeptical about the inclusion of the Professional record and earnings outside of Tour membership section near the bottom of the article. Charts at the base of the article are largely used for excellence and key information, tournament wins, solheim cup and major results etc. In this chart there are two wins that are already included in other charts, the rest is just finished 27th in Jupiter Winter Classic etc. Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia of everything and I feel it's inclusion falsely implies a special significance of the tournament's standing. This has been discussed before, but 14 years ago when the subject had only just turned pro and the amount of results/achievements for her would have been considerably smaller. Any feedback appreciated, thanks. Canary757 (talk) 06:11, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I'd delete the entire section. Tewapack (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. No objections after a week so it's now gone. Canary757 (talk) 06:53, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lexi Thompson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Canary757 (talk · contribs) 13:15, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: NicheSports (talk · contribs) 23:34, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi Canary757, the article looks in good shape. I will start this later this week and do the majority over the weekend NicheSports (talk) 00:59, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi again NicheSports. Thank you for reviewing another one of my nominations. Canary757 (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Canary757 I am at a good break point. I finished my minor copy editing pass except for the lead and only have a few requests in the Professional career section below. Also note the comment in the Scope section below about the missing 2012 season summary. If you could take a look at those, I'll proceed with the remainder of the review (spot check, images, etc.). Thank you for another great article that is easy to review NicheSports (talk) 22:09, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Cool. Thank you for copyediting the article. I'll work through your suggestions and will ping you when done. Canary757 (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Text

Lead

• No changes requested NicheSports (talk) 16:58, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Canary757 I made a few subtle but non-trivial changes to the lead, can you review and let me know if you're ok with them? Most are just my personal preference and are not necessary for the GA NicheSports (talk) 04:28, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, no issues, Canary757 (talk) 08:32, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Early life

• No changes requested NicheSports (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Amateur career

• ...overcoming Karen Chung five and four to seal the title... I am only a casual golf fan. I read the source and am still not sure what "five and four" means in a golf match/tournament (sorry). May not need to change the article, I'm mostly curious NicheSports (talk) 04:31, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

  Two players compete head-to-head. Each hole is scored separately. Player one wins the first hole and goes 1up, then 2up etc. Player one is five holes up wth only four remaining so the match ends. Canary757 (talk) 06:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Professional career

• Is there any way to reorganize the 2011–2013 section? It's not clear why these years are grouped together, as in 2011 she was playing on sponsor's exemptions and trying to earn her tour card, while in 2012 and 2013 she was playing a full tour schedule like in all subsequent years until 2025. I could imagine doing this in a few ways, the simplest would just be to split out 2012 and 2013 each as their own sections. If there are too many career sections with one per year, they could be consolidated as in Paula Creamer, but up to you NicheSports (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2026 (UTC) Each has its own section now
• From 2024. On May 28, 2024, Thompson, 29, announced that she would step back from full time golf at the end of the 2024 LPGA season after 14 years as a professional golfer, but that she would continue to play at a small number of events. This sentence is on the long side. You could remove "after 14 years as a professional golfer" or just delete "but that she would continue to play at a small number of events" (the latter is clear from context of the sentence and paragraph). NicheSports (talk) 22:03, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done Second part removed Canary757 (talk) 06:55, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Other suggestion in 2024: She won one of her four matches, securing a victory in the foursomes with Lauren Coughlin against Georgia Hall and Maja Stark. The United States secured the overall victory and Thompson finished with a 1–3–0 record in the tournament. "securing victory" is used in back to back sentences. Also these two sentences are mixed chronologically/logically; the first sentence is about Thompson's performance, then the next sentence describes the overall team result, before ending with a summary of Thompson's performance. NicheSports (talk) 22:03, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done Re-jigged, clinched Canary757 (talk) 06:57, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Personal life

• No changes requested NicheSports (talk) 21:57, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Sourcing

Cites WP:RS

relies on high quality sources: ESPN, Golf Magazine, BBC Sport, etc. NicheSports (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Spot check

pass, checks collapsed below for readability

Source checks

First round

• Thompson was home-schooled, getting up early in the morning to carry out her studies before playing golf in both the mornings and afternoons. She graduated from high school in July 2012. Y verifies in 3 NicheSports (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• In 2008, Thompson won the U.S. Girls' Junior at Hartford Golf Club, overcoming Karen Chung five and four to seal the title and become the second-youngest winner of the trophy. Y verifies in 12 NicheSports (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• Lacking official status as an LPGA Tour member, she largely had to rely on sponsor exemptions to gain entry into tournaments. Her first sponsor's exemption came at the ShopRite LPGA Classic, where she missed the cut by four strokes. N bolded fails verification in 21 NicheSports (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done Added a ref, reworded Canary757 (talk) 08:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• In December 2010, Thompson petitioned the LPGA to increase the number of tournaments she could enter using sponsor exemptions from six to twelve. In January 2011, Commissioner Mike Whan denied Thompson's petition, but announced that the LPGA rules would be changed to allow non-members to participate in Monday qualifying for events they wished to enter. N I did not see bolded bit in 25 NicheSports (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done Added an additional ref Canary757 (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Tied after 18 holes, she beat Brett Bergeron on the second playoff hole, earning her first professional win. Victory also meant she became just the second woman to win a Fuzion Minor League event. N I didn't see bolded section in the source. The rest verified in NicheSports (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done Canary757 (talk) 07:43, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• In March, Thompson entered the Monday qualifier for the LPGA Kia Classic but failed to qualify. Y verified in 29 NicheSports (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• Her record stood for 11 months until 15-year-old Lydia Ko won the 2012 CN Canadian Women's Open the following year. Y verifies in 34 NicheSports (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• This win made her the youngest professional winner on the LET at age 16 years, 10 months, 8 days, and the second-youngest overall, after Amy Yang, who was four months younger when she won the 2006 ANZ Ladies Masters as an amateur. Y verifies in 35 , but this means the lead is wrong N – it states that she was 16 years, seven months, and eight days old (I assume derived from this in the body, with a typo of 10 months to seven) when she won her first LPGA title NicheSports (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

  16 y 10 months is for her first LET title. The 16y 7 months in the lead is for her first LPGA win, so is correct, however the latter was missing in the 2011 section so I have added it. Canary757 (talk) 06:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Thompson successfully petitioned the LPGA for an age waiver allowing her to enter the 2011 LPGA Qualifying School for Tour membership in 2012. The first of three stages was held in July at the LPGA International course in Daytona Beach, Florida. Thompson won stage one by ten strokes, with the top 50 finishers and ties advancing to stage two N bolded fails verification in 36 NicheSports (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done Added a new reference Canary757 (talk) 12:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Second round

• Having won the Navistar LPGA Classic, Thompson withdrew from qualifying school Y verifies in 38 NicheSports (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• ...and was awarded membership of the tour for 2012. Y verifies in 39 , although both the archive and og links there didn't work so I updated them, although wayback is intermittently down rn so may not serve NicheSports (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• She was unable to defend her title from the year previously, finishing the event two strokes behind Stacy Lewis. Y verifies in 41 NicheSports (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Thompson was named by the United States to make her Solheim Cup debut, the youngest ever player to represent the United States at the competition. Y verifies in 45 NicheSports (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• She recorded rounds of 73, 64, 69, and 68 at Mission Hills Country Club in Rancho Mirage, California to secure a three-stroke victory over Michelle Wie. After her win, Thompson said: "This was one of my goals coming into the year, to win a major...It's such a huge honor with all the history behind the tournament." Y everything verifies except for the name of the country club, which was not in 50 , but verifies in 51 , which is cited for the preceding sentence. I added 51 to this sentence as well just to be safe NicheSports (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• She then won her sixth LPGA Tour title, and her second of the year, at the LPGA KEB Hana Bank Championship in Incheon, South Korea. Thompson finished the tournament 15-under-par and said afterwards: "I don’t really play for myself as much as I play for my country. I love being an American and it’s a great honor to be the first American to win in Korea." Y all of this verifies in 58 NicheSports (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• In April, Thompson was penalized a total of four strokes for replacing her ball incorrectly on the green while playing the 17th hole of her third round at the ANA Inspiration. The infringement was reported by a TV viewer and assessed after completion of the round, which meant that in addition to receiving a two-stroke penalty for replacing the ball incorrectly, she was also penalized two strokes for signing an incorrect scorecard. Y fully verifies in 73 NicheSports (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Prior to the CME Group Tour Championship in November, it was reported that Thompson had split from her caddie Kevin McAlpine. Y verifies in 90 NicheSports (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• In October 2018, Thompson shared how body image issues had affected her. She explained that she would put herself through two "brutal" workouts every day, had cut back on eating, and that she would weigh herself "constantly" while comparing herself to thin models. She described how she had been self-critical of her own body, but that over time her mindset had changed. Thompson stated: "what I’ve learned is that I’m not going to deprive myself in the one life I get to live, I’m going to enjoy life and my food. You should never compare your body to others it’s a never ending battle of being miserable trust me. Your body is your body, it is beautiful so embrace it." Y fully verifies in 148 NicheSports (talk) 21:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Copyright

Earwig was clean, any similarities were due to quotes (mostly) and some sporting event boilerplate NicheSports (talk) 04:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Scope

sorted NicheSports (talk) 04:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• I didn't see any info on Thompson's 2012 season, the first she had a tour card. There is coverage, quick search turned up . Could you build out a paragraph covering that season? Lmk if I missed something NicheSports (talk) 21:48, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done Canary757 (talk) 13:12, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Illustration

All five images are relevant and appropriately licensed NicheSports (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

General comments

• @Canary757 opening this for discussion. I found a few possible source-to-text integrity issues in my spot checks above – can you take a look? NicheSports (talk) 05:08, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hopefully fixed and satisfactory. As someone who prides myself on good referencing, I'm annoyed I hadn't picked up on these tbh. I just re-checked most of the refs across her early career. Canary757 (talk) 08:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

  No worries, I am not too concerned, all issues I found were in prose that predated your edits to the article and Talk:Victoria Pendleton/GA1 was the first review I've done where all source checks validated. Thank you for doing a broader check of the early career sections. I'll do a second pass of checks tonight NicheSports (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @Canary757 I found two more potential issues above - can you take a look and confirm? NicheSports (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Canary757 thanks for fixing those. I am still feeling good about the review but I put it on hold to give time for some more spot checks. Would you be able to do a round of checks throughout the Lexi Thompson#Professional career section? Let me know when you think its ready and I'll do a second round NicheSports (talk) 06:24, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hi. Part one. 20=date is from the article publish date. 21, 22=fine 23=simple math needed -3 to +6 is diff of 9. 24, 25, 26, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 all fine.

  50=I removed '274' so now fine. 45=small rewording was required. 47, 48, both good. 55=requires minor counting on leaderboard, so ok. 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 all fine. Canary757 (talk) 08:11, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  61 63 67 68 69 71 72 74 75 76 77 79 83 85 all fine. 62 requires simple math -12 to -9 is diff of 3. 78 requires counting to 7 on the leaderboard. Canary757 (talk) 08:35, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  88 90 91 93 all fine. 94=basic counting 95=uncited venue removed. 99 102 103 104 all good. 105=basic counting. Canary757 (talk) 08:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  107 109 110 111 112 116 117 123 124 125 126 129 131 132 133 135 141 142 143 all fine. 108=I added 'joint' for clarity. 121=I deleted the location. 122=I deleted LET. 144=small rewording-I removed 'dropped'. Canary757 (talk) 09:55, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  153&154 (via archive), 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 167 168 all fine

  replaced faulty ref 49

  64 65 66 all fine

  118 needs basic counting but okay

  Added 138 to supplement venue, removed town, will push 140+ref checks from previous edit up a place Canary757 (talk) 11:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  Super appreciated. I'll get back to this tomorrow afternoon NicheSports (talk) 02:22, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for all of those source checks, my second round of spot check fully verified so will pass this now NicheSports (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.