Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23c973f6e8007d6

Jump to content

Talk:Leviton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Likeanechointheforest in topic Images Request

Old news

[edit]

I keep uploading information, and someone keeps erasing it saying that it is blatant advertising. So I've changed it and it is no longer in any shape or form advertising... if they would read it, instead of just erasing it everytime, they would see it isn't. - krieglax23

I removed the text below due to the extreme bias shown. - Kenwarren 18:28, Jul 25, 2004 (UTC)

Leviton mass produces low-end residential quality electrical products. These products include cheap snap-together brass light sockets that use a cardboard insulator between the live electrical terminals and the metal housing. Since there is no ground connection, it is common to receive an electric shock from a light fixture or metal lamp, if it uses a Leviton socket.

Leviton also manufactures electrical switches. Leviton's 4-way switch (a polarity-reversing switch also used for turning lights on and off from one floor of a stairwell where there are at least two other 3-way switches) has proven to be defective.

[edit]

LevitOFF: A compendium of experiences and anecdotes about problems with LevitON products

Ripped off text.

[edit]

The contents of the article seem to have been copied directly out of a Leviton press release. Can we cut out the plagiarized marketing-speak and have a real write-up on the company and its products? Rusty 22:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

There we go

[edit]

Now it's no longer a "rip-off". But, it needs more work. Leviton is a huge company. We also need a logo and some pictures.

I'll remove the stub catagory tag soon; unless someone objects? --Charles Gaudette 20:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Comments from krieglax23

[edit]

I keep uploading information, and someone keeps erasing it saying that it is blatant advertising. So I've changed it and it is no longer in any shape or form advertising... if they would read it, instead of just erasing it everytime, they would see it isn't. - krieglax23 17:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Some of the text, particularly the timeline, appears to be a copyright violation and to have been taken from the company's web site. Reliable, neutral sources should be cited, rather than the company's site. --Eastmain 18:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Patent Lawsuit

[edit]

Could someone re-add this to the article? Krieglax23 removed this before he/she was blocked and I think it is worth mentioning. RookwoodDept. of Mysteries 22:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Attention Corporate PR Department/Agent

[edit]

If you would like to help us expand this article, please post a list of major news appearances here on the talk page. To avoid conflict of interest problems, and potential embarrassment, you may want to avoid editing the article itself. Jehochman (talk/contrib) 07:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo Leviton bleu jpg.jpg

[edit]

Image:Logo Leviton bleu jpg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo Leviton bleu jpg.jpg

[edit]

Image:Logo Leviton bleu jpg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leviton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

History edit request

[edit]

Hi editors of Wikipedia, this is Meaghan. I'm an employee at Burson, and our client is Leviton, so please note that I've disclosed my COI over on my user page for full transparency: user:MeagYoungblood. I've been working away at a draft that would update the Leviton History section as the article is incredibly outdated, and lacking in both historical information as well as recent developments. Additionally, there are multiple uncited sentences I've either removed or provided a proper citation for, as well as removed some more promotional-sounding bits.

This new History section would ideally replace the existing one, plus remove the Patent lawsuits section. I in no way want to diminish the lawsuit by removing the section; I just don't believe it is significant enough to have it as its entire own section. I would also love to get some feedback on that if any editors have opinions on this.

I understand this is a reasonably large draft, so to the editor (or editors) that do take the time to evaluate this request: Thank you for your time.

Here is a list of changes I've made to the article with the draft:

Please read the History draft below:

I understand that this is quite a lengthy request, so I'm thankful to editors who take a look at this and provide some feedback. I've been working at understanding what is and isn't acceptable sourcing, so if there is anything wrong with this draft, please reply below, and I'll be responsive. Thank you! MeagYoungblood (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I've returned to this request since there's been no movement. I went back into the article's history to find editors who've made updates to the article in the past to drop a (hopefully not bothersome) ping: User:Drmies, User:Codename Noreste, and User:Alien333. Again, I understand this is a big edit request, so if you have any questions or feedback, please ping me back, and I'll respond quickly. MeagYoungblood (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I probably won't look into this, but I wanted to tell you that, in general, it's normal to have long delays, there are as of now 92 other COI edit requests, including some dating from May.
Also, pinging random editors won't really help. Most editors do not review COI edit requests, and I, at least, usually don't. I only do antivandalism over here, and removed something unsourced because I happened to check this page for vandalism.
The most useful thing to do is probably to wait it out until someone takes a look at the backlog (which shouldn't be that long, probably a few weeks). — Alien 3
3 3
17:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, it's not bad, and I moved it over. MeagYoungblood, if you're going to be transparent, you might as well tell us how you learned to edit this code so quickly, and/or whether you've had earlier experience here. Drmies (talk) 17:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi User:Drmies, thank you for adding this to the article. I spent a good amount of time learning how Wikipedia works while finalizing the History draft I posted (you can see in my references that they are dated back to a few months ago). Also, I'm curious about your opinion on the prose flag that was added to the article. I'm not sure it's entirely fair, but if there is anything I could do to get the flag removed, I'd be willing to, of course. Again, thank you. MeagYoungblood (talk) 22:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well rewriting the text would help, MeagYoungblood, but I noticed you didn't answer my question. Drmies (talk) 23:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I will certainly look into rewriting portions of History to remove the tag, although that may take me a good amount of time. Regarding your question, I don't have any prior history of editing other Wikipedia articles outside of this one. I started learning about Wikipedia earlier this year to help with this page and took my time to develop the coded draft! MeagYoungblood (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction edit request

[edit]

Hi editors, I'm back with one more edit request. This time, it is much shorter: I noticed the Introduction was shrunken down quite a bit when my edit request to update the article's History section was implemented, leaving the existing intro to say that Leviton only manufactures electrical wiring, which is simply inaccurate. So, I drafted a new Introduction for review.

This new draft seeks to add back in a list of products, but this time, the products listed reflect the new sourcing within the article.

Please take a look below:

It would be awesome if editors had time to review and potentially implement this new Intro. Again, if you have any questions, please let me know!! Thank you!! MeagYoungblood (talk) 18:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is a very long list that is rather unwieldy to read. Could you maybe condense it? The first sentence of an article is usually supposed to shortly present the subject, so not every bit of information in the rest of the article should be present in there. — Alien 3
3 3
19:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi User:Alien333, thanks for the helpful feedback. I went back into the backend text and removed some of the language to condense it. Specifically, I removed the following: lighting, dimmers, switches, wall and ceiling occupancy sensors, wall plates, and electrical light sockets.
Please review here:
Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc. is an American manufacturer of electrical wiring equipment in North America. The company produces electrical outlets including GFCI and USB charging devices, network infrastructure, lighting control systems, load centers and circuit breakers, EV charging stations, and utility submetering.
If there is anything else I can do to help implement this Introduction into the article, please let me know. Again, thank you for the feedback! MeagYoungblood (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Still a bit long, but it'll be fine, I will add it to the article. — Alien 3
3 3
19:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Images Request

[edit]

Hi editors, I'm back with another edit request. I noticed the article does not include many images, so I have provided two additional images for consideration.

Please take a look below:

If editors have time to review and potentially implement these new images, that would be wonderful. If you have any questions, please let me know! Appreciate it! MeagYoungblood (talk) 18:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done Likeanechointheforest (talk) 21:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)Reply