Talk:Lethality
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by 2001:8003:AC60:1400:70CF:E803:F148:828E in topic Increased usage in military context
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 January 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit] | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Increased usage in military context
[edit]In recent months I have read it often in military context, e.g. increased lethality of new weapons. On a site from Guam, where they discuss that whales beach because of sonar use, the military defends the situation that they must have 'increased warfighting lethality'. Military announcements in Australia have also recently contained that word often in the context of the current war preparations. 2001:8003:AC60:1400:70CF:E803:F148:828E (talk) 02:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)