Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have added a paragraph detailing the German Army's requirement for the new Leopard 2AX upgrade (informally referred to as "Leopard 3"). This tank is explicitly developed as an interim solution to bridge the gap until the MGCS enters service (c. 2040s) and serves as a strategic "Plan B" in case of major project delays or failure. Since the Leopard 3 / 2AX development directly impacts the status and timeline of the joint Franco-German MGCS project, I believe this information is relevant to the MGCS article. The data, including the 25-year service life and the 1,000-tank total requirement (mix of 2A8/L3/MGCS), is sourced from recent defense industry reports (Army Recognition, The War Zone, Hartpunkt). I welcome any discussion regarding the placement or nomenclature.Lehrling18 (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
