Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a242dbbb3be9a68e

Jump to content

Talk:Lemnoideae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by ~2025-31208-44 in topic As food

I have ordered the Lemnacean genuses in the order from most to least complex, which also follows the most recent phylogenetic trees.- Zeamays.

Does this belong?

[edit]

"duck weed is an invasive species found mostly in the sub-artic regions of the world. Many polar bears and penguins love to eat it."

I don't know if that belongs or not. It's under taxonomy, which seems wrong to me. Pgrote 07:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The title of this article should be changed to the correct spelling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.153.149 (talk) 00:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Only positive

[edit]

This article is only mentioning duckweed in a positive way. But in reality, it is an invasive species and can destroy lakes by covering the surface entirely, killing all underwater plants and fish. This definitely should be mentioned.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.34.191.247 (talk) 14:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lemnoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lemnoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lemnoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lemnoideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

As food

[edit]

What part of the plant is eaten by humans? I guess the seeds, but it is not clear. --Error (talk) 13:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

(Almot 5 years later) It is ridiculous that information about exactly how duckweed is prepared and consumed by humans hasn't been added, and your question hasn't been answered or even addressed. That's not very encyclopedic or professional! ~2025-31208-44 (talk) 01:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aren't they their own family now?

[edit]

Most recent papers refer to duckweeds as their own family now, don't they? Like this one, which mentions they used to be considered part of the Araceae but aren't anymore: https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/33/10/3207/6323365 118.211.107.9 (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

As of October 2025, the major taxonomic databases used Araceae: go to Lemna and use the taxonbar to look at GRIN, GBIF, PoWO, WFO, etc. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
However, I have now added a note sourced to this paper. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply