Talk:Leiden school
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Eva UX in topic Unfocused
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 30 August 2025. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| This page was proposed for deletion by Antibabelic (talk · contribs) on 27 August 2025 with the comment: The article based only on a primary source. I couldn't find any independent sources discussing this school of thought. There are some independent mentions of the Leiden school in linguistics literature, but it's in relation to historical linguistic models, not the memetic approach to language that this article is about. Therefore, the notability for the topic can't be established. It was contested by Eva UX (talk · contribs) on 29 August 2025 with the comment: Added Unfocused; and removed Proposed deletion/dated tags: Then maybe this tag is more appropriate |
Unfocused
[edit]Hello @Eva_UX! I'm not entirely sure why you've added the Unfocused tag, could you explain your reasoning? The article as it stands seems to be very specific. Antibabelic (talk) 12:05, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, and thank you. I’ve removed it. I just thought it was appropriate given your PROD comment but your are right, it is focused, maybe only not focused on the most notable topic it should, preferably, be focused on. Cheers - E. Ux 12:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)