Talk:Lego Star Wars

New 2007 Sets

• 7654 - Droids Battle Pack
• 7655 - Clone Troopers Battle Pack
• 7656 - General Grievous' Starfighter
• 7657 - AT-ST
• 7658 - Y-wing Fighter
• 7659 - Imperial Landing Craft

Just found this, they were listed on the German Amazon site, wait for official confirmation (which could take a while) from Lego before adding these on. Gran2 18:06, June 2006 (UTC)

The Exo-Force are some, but this not official cofirmed Antidermis2319 21:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok. 1. I do understand German, and it doesn't give any information, if it did, I would have added it on. 2. I meant more information from Lego themselves, this has yet to be officially confirmed by them. And dispite being respectable Amazon have been wrong with some things in the past. I have no doubts these are real, but, it seems pointless to add these on until they are officialy confirmed and we have more information. Preferably which of the films, or indeed the Clone Wars, the Battle Packs fall under. So I suggest we leave them off until we know more. I will not remove it yet because its best to discuss this here. Gran2 18:18 , 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, scrap what I said, they're all in the correct film section. Woo yeah! Roll on pictures! Gran2 21:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I put this in article. Exo-Force, Bionicle and all Lego have future products in Amazon germany.... Antidermis2319 23:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

As long as we kept them up to date with any new information, it should be ok. Gran2 07:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Got more information, chiukeung of fbtb has seen all of the sets, and has been able to describe them, giving the minifigs. Gran2 06:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Games

Shouldn't the Lego Star Wars videogames be mentioned somewhere in this article? 83.252.141.112 15:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I'll put a link to them in it. Gran2 15:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

2007 sets

Have the 7662 MTT, 7661 Jedi Starfighter and the 7660 Naboo Fighter confirmed yet? -NighthawkLeader 04:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

No they haven't, they are just a rumour. Meaning that they should not be listed here. I think it was some random IP that added them on. There gone now though, hopefully until they are officially confirmed. Gran2 06:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

2007 packs

Did they release the stormtroopers battle pack yet? or did they just release the droids and clones??71.2.38.191 00:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

What stormtrooper battle pack? Gran² 05:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

2008 sets

• Has 7669, 7670, 7671 and 7672 been confirmed? I can only find these on rumor sites, though it'd be good if they're real NighthawkLeader 00:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bwingohyeah.jpeg

Image:Bwingohyeah.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

External links URL

In the External links section, I believe that instead of a link to Wookieepedia, or perhaps in addition to it, a better resource for LEGO Star Wars would be the wiki dedicated to the game alone, which can be found at http://legostarwars.wikia.com 69.247.180.216 (talk) 00:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Main article

I'm considering creating a main article for the video game series. The series now occupies five articles: the three games, a mobile phone adaptation of the second, and a list of characters. Opinions? Tezero (talk) 22:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Citation

I provided a citation for Star Wars being the first Lego licensee, but would like to know if it is viable or not, here is the link http://www.metro.co.uk/tech/games/885284-lego-gets-lord-of-the-rings-and-hobbit-licence . It is in regards to the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings license that was acquired recently, but they do mention that Star Wars was first. Contact me here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aleksandar_Bulovic%27 if need be. Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksandar Bulovic' (talk • contribs) 19:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

LEGO Star Wars

An Average LEGO Star Wars Edition TV Series — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:81:8500:C284:B140:A8D1:F293:1723 (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lego Star Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090902023406/http://blog.media-freaks.com/quest-r2d2-lego-star-wars-celebrates-ten-years/ to http://blog.media-freaks.com/quest-r2d2-lego-star-wars-celebrates-ten-years/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lego Star Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090531100139/http://sev.prnewswire.com/entertainment/20090213/SF7049213022009-1.html to http://sev.prnewswire.com/entertainment/20090213/SF7049213022009-1.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.playthings.com/article/CA6686243.html?industryid=47324

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Minifigure Inaccuracy

In the construction sets section, under the Header Minifigures, is the line, “Most characters from the Star Wars universe have materialized in Lego form.” This claim is unsubstantiated. Also considering the large size of the Star Wars universe I find it highly unlikely to be true. I propose that the line should either have ‘main’ inserted before characters or otherwise be removed entirely. Of course it would be best if a source could be found for the claim. I am sorry if this is not phrased properly, I am new to Wikipedia this is the first thing I’ve done. Swyix (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Lego R2-D2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

• LEGO Star Wars Custom Acrylic Stands, by LaserLabs - 22669114357.jpg
• LEGO Star Wars Custom Acrylic Stands, by LaserLabs - 22669141167.jpg
• LEGO Star Wars Custom Acrylic Stands, by LaserLabs - 23073861512.jpg
• LEGO Star Wars Custom Acrylic Stands, by LaserLabs - 23098705691.jpg
• LEGO Star Wars Custom Acrylic Stands, by LaserLabs.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

• Lego AT-AT.jpg (discussion)
• Lego Millenium Falcon.jpg (discussion)

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Lego mandalorian.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Set Numbers

Are we going to put the set numbers in front of the sets or behind? e.g #75368 Darth Vader Mech or R2-D2 (set number: #75308) Troglodyte78 (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Definitely after the set, as most people recognize the name, but those interested in more specific means of recognition will simply need to look past the name. 67.253.73.169 (talk) 10:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Include a list of UCS sets?

The previous description of UCS had the more recent sets listed out within a paragraph. It was extremely clunky and I deleted them, but I do think that an argument could be made for an actual, formatted list of every UCS set, as well as potentially every Master Builder set. Lego Star Wars is arguably best known for its UCS sets, so I don't think it would be unwarranted.

To be honest, I'm a bit mixed on the idea myself, but considering that the UCS sets are some of the most notable sets in both the theme and all of Lego, I'm honestly kinda leaning on yes. VeeJayZee (talk) 18:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Set numbering consistency

Should we even list the set number of sets regularly? If so, how?

Most sets that aren't one-of-a-kind regarding source material (ex: The Death Star) can be disambiguated with more standard metrics, such as year (Ex: 2008's Death Star vs 2016's Death Star) or set line (Ex: UCS Super Star Destroyer vs Midi-Scale Super Star Destroyer), and using that disambiguation provides a more clear idea of what the set actually is than a somewhat arbitrary number. I'm not opposed to keeping set numbers, but I do feel this argument should be stated.

Additionally, if we do, how do we standardize it? Do we say the number before or after? Do we keep it in a hashtag like on the box (ex: "In 2008, Lego released the Death Star #10188.") or do we include parentheses ("... released the Death Star (10188)")? Do we use both? (#10188)

Some standardization and mutual agreement is extremely needed since there are multiple standards used throughout the article. Me personally, I think we should either do "Death Star (10188)", or keep set numbers to a minimum unless helpful for disambiguation. The hashtag makes the number look messy and slapped in in my opinion. VeeJayZee (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2026 (UTC)