Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2679482884bb7b5

Jump to content

Talk:Legislative consent motion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by GothicGolem29 in topic New refused LCM

Proposal for move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED by proposer per lack of objections. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Porposed move to: Legislative Consent Motion

Seeing as the official name is now "Legislative Consent Motion" shouldn't the article be changed with "Sewel motion" becoming a re-direct? Davidkinnen 20:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Survery

[edit]

Support

[edit]
  1. Propose and Support - the official name has changed so should the page

Oppose

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wales

[edit]

Following the referendum passing in 2011, Wales also has legislative powers, including the system of legislative consent motions. -Rrius (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legislative Consent Motion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Update needed

[edit]

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill Kaihsu (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

New refused LCM

[edit]

The constitution secutary Angus Robertson says it will have been breached ten times when the rules bill gets royal assent. Does someone want to add that to the list either now or after royal assent? GothicGolem29 (talk) 23:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply